1988 Pacific Seacraft 31 vs 2010 Elan 340 — Comparison

1988 Pacific Seacraft 31
VS
2010 Elan 3402010 Elan 340

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1988 Pacific Seacraft 312010 Elan 340
General
ManufacturerPacific SeacraftElan
Year1988–20072010–2014
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSASlovenia
DesignerWilliam CrealockRob Humphreys
Dimensions
LOA9.45 m (31.0 ft)10.36 m (34.0 ft)
LWL7.62 m (25.0 ft)9.00 m (29.5 ft)
Beam3.05 m (10.0 ft)3.40 m (11.2 ft)
Draft1.37 m (4.5 ft)1.95 m (6.4 ft)
Weight
Displacement4,990 kg (11,001 lbs)5,800 kg (12,787 lbs)
Ballast2,177 kg (4,799 lbs)1,750 kg (3,858 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area40.5 m² (436 ft²)55.0 m² (592 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFullFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine25 HP21 HP
Fuel Capacity76 L (20.1 gal)80 L (21.1 gal)
Water Capacity151 L (39.9 gal)160 L (42.3 gal)
Accommodation
Berths56
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1988 Pacific Seacraft 31
14.09
2010 Elan 340
17.31
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1988 Pacific Seacraft 31
43.63
2010 Elan 340
30.17
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1988 Pacific Seacraft 31
0.71
2010 Elan 340
0.76
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1988 Pacific Seacraft 31
26.02
2010 Elan 340
19.73

Detailed Comparison

The 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31 and 2010 Elan 340 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31 is a 1980s design by Pacific Seacraft from USA, while the 2010 Elan 340 is a modern offering from Elan from Slovenia. The 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31 was penned by William Crealock. The 2010 Elan 340 was designed by Rob Humphreys.

In terms of size, the 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31 measures 9.45m (31.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.05m, compared to the 2010 Elan 340 at 10.36m (34.0ft) with a 3.40m beam. The 2010 Elan 340 is 0.91m longer than the 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31. The 2010 Elan 340 displaces approximately 16% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31 has modest sail power for its displacement with an SA/D ratio of 14.09 and 40.5 m² of sail area. The 2010 Elan 340, with an SA/D of 17.31 and 55.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The 2010 Elan 340 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 26.0) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.71). The 2010 Elan 340 has a comfort ratio of 19.7 and a capsize screening value of 0.76. The ballast ratios are 43.6% for the 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31 and 30.2% for the 2010 Elan 340, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31 provides 5 berths in 2 cabins with 151L of water capacity and 76L of fuel. The 2010 Elan 340 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 160L water and 80L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 2010 Elan 340 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 2010 Elan 340 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31 · 2010 Elan 340