1989 Catalina 36 vs 2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31 — Comparison

1989 Catalina 361989 Catalina 36
VS
2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1989 Catalina 362000 Hallberg-Rassy 31
General
ManufacturerCatalinaHallberg-Rassy
Year1989–19942000–2010
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSASweden
DesignerFrank ButlerGerman Frers
Dimensions
LOA10.97 m (36.0 ft)9.47 m (31.1 ft)
LWL9.14 m (30.0 ft)8.25 m (27.1 ft)
Beam3.65 m (12.0 ft)3.18 m (10.4 ft)
Draft1.83 m (6.0 ft)1.60 m (5.2 ft)
Weight
Displacement6,804 kg (15,000 lbs)4,600 kg (10,141 lbs)
Ballast2,722 kg (6,001 lbs)1,850 kg (4,079 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area56.3 m² (606 ft²)44.5 m² (479 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine22 HP21 HP
Fuel Capacity114 L (30.1 gal)80 L (21.1 gal)
Water Capacity189 L (49.9 gal)140 L (37.0 gal)
Accommodation
Berths75
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1989 Catalina 36
15.93
2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31
16.35
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1989 Catalina 36
40.01
2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31
40.22
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1989 Catalina 36
0.77
2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31
0.77
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1989 Catalina 36
19.85
2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31
20.39

Detailed Comparison

The 1989 Catalina 36 and 2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1989 Catalina 36 is a 1980s design by Catalina from USA, while the 2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31 is a 2000s offering from Hallberg-Rassy from Sweden. The 1989 Catalina 36 was penned by Frank Butler. The 2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31 was designed by German Frers.

In terms of size, the 1989 Catalina 36 measures 10.97m (36.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.65m, compared to the 2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31 at 9.47m (31.1ft) with a 3.18m beam. The 1989 Catalina 36 is 1.50m longer than the 2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31. The 1989 Catalina 36 displaces approximately 48% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1989 Catalina 36 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 15.93 and 56.3 m² of sail area. The 2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31, with an SA/D of 16.35 and 44.5 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1989 Catalina 36 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 19.9) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.77). The 2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31 has a comfort ratio of 20.4 and a capsize screening value of 0.77. The ballast ratios are 40.0% for the 1989 Catalina 36 and 40.2% for the 2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1989 Catalina 36 provides 7 berths in 2 cabins with 189L of water capacity and 114L of fuel. The 2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31 offers 5 berths in 2 cabins with 140L water and 80L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1989 Catalina 36 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1989 Catalina 36 · 2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31