1989 Hallberg-Rassy 36 vs 1973 Ranger 33 — Comparison

1989 Hallberg-Rassy 36
VS
1973 Ranger 331973 Ranger 33

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1989 Hallberg-Rassy 361973 Ranger 33
General
ManufacturerHallberg-RassyRanger
Year1989–20001973–1979
TypeSloopSloop
CountrySwedenUSA
DesignerGerman FrersGary Mull
Dimensions
LOA10.85 m (35.6 ft)10.06 m (33.0 ft)
LWL9.14 m (30.0 ft)8.23 m (27.0 ft)
Beam3.47 m (11.4 ft)3.05 m (10.0 ft)
Draft1.80 m (5.9 ft)1.52 m (5.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement7,257 kg (15,999 lbs)4,763 kg (10,501 lbs)
Ballast2,948 kg (6,499 lbs)2,041 kg (4,500 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area60.5 m² (651 ft²)43.0 m² (463 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine35 HP15 HP
Fuel Capacity150 L (39.6 gal)57 L (15.1 gal)
Water Capacity250 L (66.0 gal)95 L (25.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths66
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1989 Hallberg-Rassy 36
16.40
1973 Ranger 33
15.43
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1989 Hallberg-Rassy 36
40.62
1973 Ranger 33
42.85
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1989 Hallberg-Rassy 36
0.72
1973 Ranger 33
0.73
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1989 Hallberg-Rassy 36
22.82
1973 Ranger 33
21.50

Detailed Comparison

The 1989 Hallberg-Rassy 36 and 1973 Ranger 33 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1989 Hallberg-Rassy 36 is a 1980s design by Hallberg-Rassy from Sweden, while the 1973 Ranger 33 is a 1970s offering from Ranger from USA. The 1989 Hallberg-Rassy 36 was penned by German Frers. The 1973 Ranger 33 was designed by Gary Mull.

In terms of size, the 1989 Hallberg-Rassy 36 measures 10.85m (35.6ft) overall with a beam of 3.47m, compared to the 1973 Ranger 33 at 10.06m (33.0ft) with a 3.05m beam. The 1989 Hallberg-Rassy 36 is 0.79m longer than the 1973 Ranger 33. The 1989 Hallberg-Rassy 36 displaces approximately 52% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1989 Hallberg-Rassy 36 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.40 and 60.5 m² of sail area. The 1973 Ranger 33, with an SA/D of 15.43 and 43.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 1989 Hallberg-Rassy 36 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1989 Hallberg-Rassy 36 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 22.8) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.72). The 1973 Ranger 33 has a comfort ratio of 21.5 and a capsize screening value of 0.73. The ballast ratios are 40.6% for the 1989 Hallberg-Rassy 36 and 42.9% for the 1973 Ranger 33, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1989 Hallberg-Rassy 36 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 250L of water capacity and 150L of fuel. The 1973 Ranger 33 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 95L water and 57L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1989 Hallberg-Rassy 36 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1989 Hallberg-Rassy 36 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1989 Hallberg-Rassy 36 · 1973 Ranger 33