1989 Hallberg-Rassy 36 vs 1983 Irwin 32 — Comparison

1989 Hallberg-Rassy 36
VS
1983 Irwin 32

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1989 Hallberg-Rassy 361983 Irwin 32
General
ManufacturerHallberg-RassyIrwin
Year1989–20001983–1988
TypeSloopSloop
CountrySwedenUSA
DesignerGerman FrersTed Irwin
Dimensions
LOA10.85 m (35.6 ft)9.75 m (32.0 ft)
LWL9.14 m (30.0 ft)8.08 m (26.5 ft)
Beam3.47 m (11.4 ft)3.20 m (10.5 ft)
Draft1.80 m (5.9 ft)1.52 m (5.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement7,257 kg (15,999 lbs)4,990 kg (11,001 lbs)
Ballast2,948 kg (6,499 lbs)2,041 kg (4,500 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area60.5 m² (651 ft²)41.0 m² (441 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine35 HP18 HP
Fuel Capacity150 L (39.6 gal)68 L (18.0 gal)
Water Capacity250 L (66.0 gal)114 L (30.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths66
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1989 Hallberg-Rassy 36
16.40
1983 Irwin 32
14.27
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1989 Hallberg-Rassy 36
40.62
1983 Irwin 32
40.90
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1989 Hallberg-Rassy 36
0.72
1983 Irwin 32
0.75
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1989 Hallberg-Rassy 36
22.82
1983 Irwin 32
22.12

Detailed Comparison

The 1989 Hallberg-Rassy 36 and 1983 Irwin 32 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1989 Hallberg-Rassy 36 is a 1980s design by Hallberg-Rassy from Sweden, while the 1983 Irwin 32 is a 1980s offering from Irwin from USA. The 1989 Hallberg-Rassy 36 was penned by German Frers. The 1983 Irwin 32 was designed by Ted Irwin.

In terms of size, the 1989 Hallberg-Rassy 36 measures 10.85m (35.6ft) overall with a beam of 3.47m, compared to the 1983 Irwin 32 at 9.75m (32.0ft) with a 3.20m beam. The 1989 Hallberg-Rassy 36 is 1.10m longer than the 1983 Irwin 32. The 1989 Hallberg-Rassy 36 displaces approximately 45% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1989 Hallberg-Rassy 36 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.40 and 60.5 m² of sail area. The 1983 Irwin 32, with an SA/D of 14.27 and 41.0 m² of canvas, offers modest sail power for its displacement. The 1989 Hallberg-Rassy 36 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1989 Hallberg-Rassy 36 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 22.8) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.72). The 1983 Irwin 32 has a comfort ratio of 22.1 and a capsize screening value of 0.75. The ballast ratios are 40.6% for the 1989 Hallberg-Rassy 36 and 40.9% for the 1983 Irwin 32, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1989 Hallberg-Rassy 36 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 250L of water capacity and 150L of fuel. The 1983 Irwin 32 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 114L water and 68L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1989 Hallberg-Rassy 36 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1989 Hallberg-Rassy 36 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1989 Hallberg-Rassy 36 · 1983 Irwin 32