1989 Hallberg-Rassy 36 vs Hunter 356 — Comparison

1989 Hallberg-Rassy 36
VS
Hunter 356Hunter 356

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1989 Hallberg-Rassy 36Hunter 356
General
ManufacturerHallberg-RassyHunter
Year1989–20002000–2005
TypeSloopSloop
CountrySwedenUSA
DesignerGerman FrersGlenn Henderson
Dimensions
LOA10.85 m (35.6 ft)10.82 m (35.5 ft)
LWL9.14 m (30.0 ft)9.30 m (30.5 ft)
Beam3.47 m (11.4 ft)3.53 m (11.6 ft)
Draft1.80 m (5.9 ft)1.80 m (5.9 ft)
Weight
Displacement7,257 kg (15,999 lbs)5,443 kg (12,000 lbs)
Ballast2,948 kg (6,499 lbs)2,177 kg (4,799 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area60.5 m² (651 ft²)53.0 m² (571 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine35 HP21 HP
Fuel Capacity150 L (39.6 gal)76 L (20.1 gal)
Water Capacity250 L (66.0 gal)151 L (39.9 gal)
Accommodation
Berths66
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1989 Hallberg-Rassy 36
16.40
Hunter 356
17.40
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1989 Hallberg-Rassy 36
40.62
Hunter 356
40.00
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1989 Hallberg-Rassy 36
0.72
Hunter 356
0.80
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1989 Hallberg-Rassy 36
22.82
Hunter 356
16.38

Detailed Comparison

The 1989 Hallberg-Rassy 36 and Hunter 356 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1989 Hallberg-Rassy 36 is a 1980s design by Hallberg-Rassy from Sweden, while the Hunter 356 is a 2000s offering from Hunter from USA. The 1989 Hallberg-Rassy 36 was penned by German Frers. The Hunter 356 was designed by Glenn Henderson.

In terms of size, the 1989 Hallberg-Rassy 36 measures 10.85m (35.6ft) overall with a beam of 3.47m, compared to the Hunter 356 at 10.82m (35.5ft) with a 3.53m beam. The 1989 Hallberg-Rassy 36 is 0.03m longer than the Hunter 356. The 1989 Hallberg-Rassy 36 displaces approximately 33% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1989 Hallberg-Rassy 36 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.40 and 60.5 m² of sail area. The Hunter 356, with an SA/D of 17.40 and 53.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The Hunter 356 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1989 Hallberg-Rassy 36 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 22.8) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.72). The Hunter 356 has a comfort ratio of 16.4 and a capsize screening value of 0.80. The ballast ratios are 40.6% for the 1989 Hallberg-Rassy 36 and 40.0% for the Hunter 356, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1989 Hallberg-Rassy 36 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 250L of water capacity and 150L of fuel. The Hunter 356 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 151L water and 76L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1989 Hallberg-Rassy 36 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Hunter 356 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1989 Hallberg-Rassy 36 · Hunter 356