1989 J/35 vs 2010 Elan 340 — Comparison

1989 J/35
VS
2010 Elan 3402010 Elan 340

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1989 J/352010 Elan 340
General
ManufacturerJ/BoatsElan
Year1989–19932010–2014
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSASlovenia
DesignerRod JohnstoneRob Humphreys
Dimensions
LOA10.67 m (35.0 ft)10.36 m (34.0 ft)
LWL9.14 m (30.0 ft)9.00 m (29.5 ft)
Beam3.43 m (11.3 ft)3.40 m (11.2 ft)
Draft1.98 m (6.5 ft)1.95 m (6.4 ft)
Weight
Displacement5,216 kg (11,499 lbs)5,800 kg (12,787 lbs)
Ballast2,268 kg (5,000 lbs)1,750 kg (3,858 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area57.6 m² (620 ft²)55.0 m² (592 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine18 HP21 HP
Fuel Capacity57 L (15.1 gal)80 L (21.1 gal)
Water Capacity76 L (20.1 gal)160 L (42.3 gal)
Accommodation
Berths66
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1989 J/35
19.46
2010 Elan 340
17.31
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1989 J/35
43.48
2010 Elan 340
30.17
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1989 J/35
0.79
2010 Elan 340
0.76
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1989 J/35
16.84
2010 Elan 340
19.73

Detailed Comparison

The 1989 J/35 and 2010 Elan 340 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1989 J/35 is a 1980s design by J/Boats from USA, while the 2010 Elan 340 is a modern offering from Elan from Slovenia. The 1989 J/35 was penned by Rod Johnstone. The 2010 Elan 340 was designed by Rob Humphreys.

In terms of size, the 1989 J/35 measures 10.67m (35.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.43m, compared to the 2010 Elan 340 at 10.36m (34.0ft) with a 3.40m beam. The 1989 J/35 is 0.31m longer than the 2010 Elan 340. The 2010 Elan 340 displaces approximately 11% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1989 J/35 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 19.46 and 57.6 m² of sail area. The 2010 Elan 340, with an SA/D of 17.31 and 55.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The 1989 J/35 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1989 J/35 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 16.8) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.79). The 2010 Elan 340 has a comfort ratio of 19.7 and a capsize screening value of 0.76. The ballast ratios are 43.5% for the 1989 J/35 and 30.2% for the 2010 Elan 340, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1989 J/35 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 76L of water capacity and 57L of fuel. The 2010 Elan 340 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 160L water and 80L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 2010 Elan 340 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1989 J/35 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1989 J/35 · 2010 Elan 340