1990 Dehler 31 vs 1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34 — Comparison

1990 Dehler 31
VS
1997 Hallberg-Rassy 341997 Hallberg-Rassy 34

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1990 Dehler 311997 Hallberg-Rassy 34
General
ManufacturerDehlerHallberg-Rassy
Year1990–19961997–2007
TypeSloopSloop
CountryGermanySweden
DesignerJudel/VrolijkGerman Frers
Dimensions
LOA9.45 m (31.0 ft)10.35 m (34.0 ft)
LWL8.08 m (26.5 ft)8.85 m (29.0 ft)
Beam3.13 m (10.3 ft)3.34 m (11.0 ft)
Draft1.65 m (5.4 ft)1.70 m (5.6 ft)
Weight
Displacement3,900 kg (8,598 lbs)5,800 kg (12,787 lbs)
Ballast1,560 kg (3,439 lbs)2,400 kg (5,291 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area44.0 m² (474 ft²)53.0 m² (571 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine15 HP28 HP
Fuel Capacity60 L (15.9 gal)120 L (31.7 gal)
Water Capacity100 L (26.4 gal)200 L (52.8 gal)
Accommodation
Berths56
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1990 Dehler 31
18.05
1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34
16.68
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1990 Dehler 31
40.00
1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34
41.38
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1990 Dehler 31
0.80
1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34
0.74
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1990 Dehler 31
18.18
1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34
20.67

Detailed Comparison

The 1990 Dehler 31 and 1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1990 Dehler 31 is a 1990s design by Dehler from Germany, while the 1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34 is a 1990s offering from Hallberg-Rassy from Sweden. The 1990 Dehler 31 was penned by Judel/Vrolijk. The 1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34 was designed by German Frers.

In terms of size, the 1990 Dehler 31 measures 9.45m (31.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.13m, compared to the 1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34 at 10.35m (34.0ft) with a 3.34m beam. The 1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34 is 0.90m longer than the 1990 Dehler 31. The 1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34 displaces approximately 49% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1990 Dehler 31 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 18.05 and 44.0 m² of sail area. The 1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34, with an SA/D of 16.68 and 53.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 1990 Dehler 31 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1990 Dehler 31 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 18.2) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.80). The 1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34 has a comfort ratio of 20.7 and a capsize screening value of 0.74. The ballast ratios are 40.0% for the 1990 Dehler 31 and 41.4% for the 1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1990 Dehler 31 provides 5 berths in 2 cabins with 100L of water capacity and 60L of fuel. The 1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 200L water and 120L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1990 Dehler 31 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1990 Dehler 31 · 1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34