1990 Feeling 32 vs 1976 Ericson 29 — Comparison

1990 Feeling 321990 Feeling 32
VS
1976 Ericson 291976 Ericson 29

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1990 Feeling 321976 Ericson 29
General
ManufacturerFeelingEricson
Year1990–19981976–1983
TypeSloopSloop
CountryFranceUSA
DesignerPhilippe HarléBruce King
Dimensions
LOA9.85 m (32.3 ft)8.84 m (29.0 ft)
LWL8.20 m (26.9 ft)7.32 m (24.0 ft)
Beam3.15 m (10.3 ft)2.84 m (9.3 ft)
Draft1.50 m (4.9 ft)1.52 m (5.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement4,700 kg (10,362 lbs)3,175 kg (7,000 lbs)
Ballast1,700 kg (3,748 lbs)1,361 kg (3,000 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area40.0 m² (431 ft²)34.0 m² (366 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine18 HP13 HP
Fuel Capacity60 L (15.9 gal)45 L (11.9 gal)
Water Capacity120 L (31.7 gal)76 L (20.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths55
Cabins21

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1990 Feeling 32
14.49
1976 Ericson 29
15.99
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1990 Feeling 32
36.17
1976 Ericson 29
42.87
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1990 Feeling 32
0.75
1976 Ericson 29
0.77
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1990 Feeling 32
20.72
1976 Ericson 29
20.09

Detailed Comparison

The 1990 Feeling 32 and 1976 Ericson 29 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1990 Feeling 32 is a 1990s design by Feeling from France, while the 1976 Ericson 29 is a 1970s offering from Ericson from USA. The 1990 Feeling 32 was penned by Philippe Harlé. The 1976 Ericson 29 was designed by Bruce King.

In terms of size, the 1990 Feeling 32 measures 9.85m (32.3ft) overall with a beam of 3.15m, compared to the 1976 Ericson 29 at 8.84m (29.0ft) with a 2.84m beam. The 1990 Feeling 32 is 1.01m longer than the 1976 Ericson 29. The 1990 Feeling 32 displaces approximately 48% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1990 Feeling 32 has modest sail power for its displacement with an SA/D ratio of 14.49 and 40.0 m² of sail area. The 1976 Ericson 29, with an SA/D of 15.99 and 34.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 1976 Ericson 29 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1990 Feeling 32 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 20.7) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.75). The 1976 Ericson 29 has a comfort ratio of 20.1 and a capsize screening value of 0.77. The ballast ratios are 36.2% for the 1990 Feeling 32 and 42.9% for the 1976 Ericson 29, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1990 Feeling 32 provides 5 berths in 2 cabins with 120L of water capacity and 60L of fuel. The 1976 Ericson 29 offers 5 berths in 1 cabin with 76L water and 45L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1990 Feeling 32 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1976 Ericson 29 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1990 Feeling 32 · 1976 Ericson 29