1990 Feeling 32 vs 1978 C&C 24 — Comparison

1990 Feeling 321990 Feeling 32
VS
1978 C&C 241978 C&C 24

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1990 Feeling 321978 C&C 24
General
ManufacturerFeelingC&C Yachts
Year1990–19981978–1983
TypeSloopSloop
CountryFranceCanada
DesignerPhilippe HarléCuthbertson & Cassian
Dimensions
LOA9.85 m (32.3 ft)7.32 m (24.0 ft)
LWL8.20 m (26.9 ft)6.10 m (20.0 ft)
Beam3.15 m (10.3 ft)2.44 m (8.0 ft)
Draft1.50 m (4.9 ft)1.22 m (4.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement4,700 kg (10,362 lbs)1,497 kg (3,300 lbs)
Ballast1,700 kg (3,748 lbs)612 kg (1,349 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area40.0 m² (431 ft²)24.0 m² (258 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine18 HP7 HP
Fuel Capacity60 L (15.9 gal)19 L (5.0 gal)
Water Capacity120 L (31.7 gal)30 L (7.9 gal)
Accommodation
Berths54
Cabins21

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1990 Feeling 32
14.49
1978 C&C 24
18.64
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1990 Feeling 32
36.17
1978 C&C 24
40.88
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1990 Feeling 32
0.75
1978 C&C 24
0.85
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1990 Feeling 32
20.72
1978 C&C 24
16.77

Detailed Comparison

The 1990 Feeling 32 and 1978 C&C 24 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1990 Feeling 32 is a 1990s design by Feeling from France, while the 1978 C&C 24 is a 1970s offering from C&C Yachts from Canada. The 1990 Feeling 32 was penned by Philippe Harlé. The 1978 C&C 24 was designed by Cuthbertson & Cassian.

In terms of size, the 1990 Feeling 32 measures 9.85m (32.3ft) overall with a beam of 3.15m, compared to the 1978 C&C 24 at 7.32m (24.0ft) with a 2.44m beam. The 1990 Feeling 32 is 2.53m longer than the 1978 C&C 24. The 1990 Feeling 32 displaces approximately 214% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1990 Feeling 32 has modest sail power for its displacement with an SA/D ratio of 14.49 and 40.0 m² of sail area. The 1978 C&C 24, with an SA/D of 18.64 and 24.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The 1978 C&C 24 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1990 Feeling 32 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 20.7) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.75). The 1978 C&C 24 has a comfort ratio of 16.8 and a capsize screening value of 0.85. The ballast ratios are 36.2% for the 1990 Feeling 32 and 40.9% for the 1978 C&C 24, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1990 Feeling 32 provides 5 berths in 2 cabins with 120L of water capacity and 60L of fuel. The 1978 C&C 24 offers 4 berths in 1 cabin with 30L water and 19L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1990 Feeling 32 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1978 C&C 24 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1990 Feeling 32 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1990 Feeling 32 · 1978 C&C 24