1990 Pacific Seacraft 34 vs 1990 Feeling 32 — Comparison

1990 Pacific Seacraft 34
VS
1990 Feeling 321990 Feeling 32

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1990 Pacific Seacraft 341990 Feeling 32
General
ManufacturerPacific SeacraftFeeling
Year1990–20071990–1998
TypeCutterSloop
CountryUSAFrance
DesignerWilliam CrealockPhilippe Harlé
Dimensions
LOA10.36 m (34.0 ft)9.85 m (32.3 ft)
LWL8.08 m (26.5 ft)8.20 m (26.9 ft)
Beam3.20 m (10.5 ft)3.15 m (10.3 ft)
Draft1.52 m (5.0 ft)1.50 m (4.9 ft)
Weight
Displacement6,350 kg (13,999 lbs)4,700 kg (10,362 lbs)
Ballast2,722 kg (6,001 lbs)1,700 kg (3,748 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area51.5 m² (554 ft²)40.0 m² (431 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFullFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine28 HP18 HP
Fuel Capacity114 L (30.1 gal)60 L (15.9 gal)
Water Capacity227 L (60.0 gal)120 L (31.7 gal)
Accommodation
Berths65
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1990 Pacific Seacraft 34
15.26
1990 Feeling 32
14.49
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1990 Pacific Seacraft 34
42.87
1990 Feeling 32
36.17
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1990 Pacific Seacraft 34
0.69
1990 Feeling 32
0.75
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1990 Pacific Seacraft 34
26.98
1990 Feeling 32
20.72

Detailed Comparison

The 1990 Pacific Seacraft 34 and 1990 Feeling 32 represent different approaches to sailboat design. The 1990 Pacific Seacraft 34 is a 1990s design by Pacific Seacraft from USA, while the 1990 Feeling 32 is a 1990s offering from Feeling from France. The 1990 Pacific Seacraft 34 was penned by William Crealock. The 1990 Feeling 32 was designed by Philippe Harlé.

In terms of size, the 1990 Pacific Seacraft 34 measures 10.36m (34.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.20m, compared to the 1990 Feeling 32 at 9.85m (32.3ft) with a 3.15m beam. The 1990 Pacific Seacraft 34 is 0.51m longer than the 1990 Feeling 32. The 1990 Pacific Seacraft 34 displaces approximately 35% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1990 Pacific Seacraft 34 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 15.26 and 51.5 m² of sail area. The 1990 Feeling 32, with an SA/D of 14.49 and 40.0 m² of canvas, offers modest sail power for its displacement. The 1990 Pacific Seacraft 34 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1990 Pacific Seacraft 34 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 27.0) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.69). The 1990 Feeling 32 has a comfort ratio of 20.7 and a capsize screening value of 0.75. The ballast ratios are 42.9% for the 1990 Pacific Seacraft 34 and 36.2% for the 1990 Feeling 32, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1990 Pacific Seacraft 34 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 227L of water capacity and 114L of fuel. The 1990 Feeling 32 offers 5 berths in 2 cabins with 120L water and 60L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1990 Pacific Seacraft 34 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1990 Pacific Seacraft 34 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1990 Pacific Seacraft 34 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1990 Pacific Seacraft 34 · 1990 Feeling 32