1990 Sabre 36 vs 1982 Westerly Konsort — Comparison

1990 Sabre 361990 Sabre 36
VS
1982 Westerly Konsort1982 Westerly Konsort

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1990 Sabre 361982 Westerly Konsort
General
ManufacturerSabreWesterly
Year1990–19981982–1990
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAUK
DesignerRoger HewsonEd Dubois
Dimensions
LOA10.97 m (36.0 ft)9.50 m (31.2 ft)
LWL9.14 m (30.0 ft)7.70 m (25.3 ft)
Beam3.35 m (11.0 ft)3.10 m (10.2 ft)
Draft1.60 m (5.2 ft)1.07 m (3.5 ft)
Weight
Displacement5,897 kg (13,001 lbs)4,536 kg (10,000 lbs)
Ballast2,449 kg (5,399 lbs)1,633 kg (3,600 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area52.5 m² (565 ft²)34.0 m² (366 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinBilge
Engine & Tanks
Engine28 HP15 HP
Fuel Capacity76 L (20.1 gal)68 L (18.0 gal)
Water Capacity151 L (39.9 gal)114 L (30.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths66
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1990 Sabre 36
16.34
1982 Westerly Konsort
12.61
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1990 Sabre 36
41.53
1982 Westerly Konsort
36.00
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1990 Sabre 36
0.74
1982 Westerly Konsort
0.75
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1990 Sabre 36
19.29
1982 Westerly Konsort
22.75

Detailed Comparison

The 1990 Sabre 36 and 1982 Westerly Konsort represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1990 Sabre 36 is a 1990s design by Sabre from USA, while the 1982 Westerly Konsort is a 1980s offering from Westerly from UK. The 1990 Sabre 36 was penned by Roger Hewson. The 1982 Westerly Konsort was designed by Ed Dubois.

In terms of size, the 1990 Sabre 36 measures 10.97m (36.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.35m, compared to the 1982 Westerly Konsort at 9.50m (31.2ft) with a 3.10m beam. The 1990 Sabre 36 is 1.47m longer than the 1982 Westerly Konsort. The 1990 Sabre 36 displaces approximately 30% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1990 Sabre 36 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.34 and 52.5 m² of sail area. The 1982 Westerly Konsort, with an SA/D of 12.61 and 34.0 m² of canvas, offers modest sail power for its displacement. The 1990 Sabre 36 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1990 Sabre 36 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 19.3) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.74). The 1982 Westerly Konsort has a comfort ratio of 22.8 and a capsize screening value of 0.75. The ballast ratios are 41.5% for the 1990 Sabre 36 and 36.0% for the 1982 Westerly Konsort, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1990 Sabre 36 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 151L of water capacity and 76L of fuel. The 1982 Westerly Konsort offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 114L water and 68L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1982 Westerly Konsort is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1990 Sabre 36 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1990 Sabre 36 · 1982 Westerly Konsort