Hunter 30 vs Hunter 33 — Comparison
Hunter 30
Hunter 33
Specifications Side by Side
| Specification | Hunter 30 | Hunter 33 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Manufacturer | Hunter | Hunter |
| Year | 1991–1996 | 1988–1994 |
| Type | Sloop | Sloop |
| Country | USA | USA |
| Designer | Hunter Design Team | Hunter Design Team |
| Dimensions | ||
| LOA | 9.14 m (30.0 ft) | 10.06 m (33.0 ft) |
| LWL | 7.92 m (26.0 ft) | 8.53 m (28.0 ft) |
| Beam | 3.05 m (10.0 ft) | 3.35 m (11.0 ft) |
| Draft | 1.52 m (5.0 ft) | 1.68 m (5.5 ft) |
| Weight | ||
| Displacement | 3,856 kg (8,501 lbs) | 4,763 kg (10,501 lbs) |
| Ballast | 1,588 kg (3,501 lbs) | 1,814 kg (3,999 lbs) |
| Sailing | ||
| Sail Area | 41.0 m² (441 ft²) | 48.0 m² (517 ft²) |
| Hull Material | Fiberglass | Fiberglass |
| Keel Type | Fin | Fin |
| Engine & Tanks | ||
| Engine | 18 HP | 21 HP |
| Fuel Capacity | 57 L (15.1 gal) | 76 L (20.1 gal) |
| Water Capacity | 114 L (30.1 gal) | 151 L (39.9 gal) |
| Accommodation | ||
| Berths | 6 | 6 |
| Cabins | 2 | 2 |
Performance Comparison
Detailed Comparison
The Hunter 30 and Hunter 33 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The Hunter 30 is a 1990s design by Hunter from USA, while the Hunter 33 is a 1980s offering from Hunter from USA. The Hunter 30 was penned by Hunter Design Team. The Hunter 33 was designed by Hunter Design Team.
In terms of size, the Hunter 30 measures 9.14m (30.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.05m, compared to the Hunter 33 at 10.06m (33.0ft) with a 3.35m beam. The Hunter 33 is 0.92m longer than the Hunter 30. The Hunter 33 displaces approximately 24% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.
Looking at performance, the Hunter 30 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.94 and 41.0 m² of sail area. The Hunter 33, with an SA/D of 17.23 and 48.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The Hunter 33 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.
For comfort and safety, the Hunter 30 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 19.5) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.78). The Hunter 33 has a comfort ratio of 18.1 and a capsize screening value of 0.80. The ballast ratios are 41.2% for the Hunter 30 and 38.1% for the Hunter 33, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.
Below deck, the Hunter 30 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 114L of water capacity and 57L of fuel. The Hunter 33 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 151L water and 76L fuel capacity.
Verdict
For cruising: The Hunter 30 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.
For racing: The Hunter 33 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.
For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.
Compare Different Boats
Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats