Hunter 30 vs 1990 Pacific Seacraft 34 — Comparison

Hunter 30Hunter 30
VS
1990 Pacific Seacraft 34

Specifications Side by Side

SpecificationHunter 301990 Pacific Seacraft 34
General
ManufacturerHunterPacific Seacraft
Year1991–19961990–2007
TypeSloopCutter
CountryUSAUSA
DesignerHunter Design TeamWilliam Crealock
Dimensions
LOA9.14 m (30.0 ft)10.36 m (34.0 ft)
LWL7.92 m (26.0 ft)8.08 m (26.5 ft)
Beam3.05 m (10.0 ft)3.20 m (10.5 ft)
Draft1.52 m (5.0 ft)1.52 m (5.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement3,856 kg (8,501 lbs)6,350 kg (13,999 lbs)
Ballast1,588 kg (3,501 lbs)2,722 kg (6,001 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area41.0 m² (441 ft²)51.5 m² (554 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFull
Engine & Tanks
Engine18 HP28 HP
Fuel Capacity57 L (15.1 gal)114 L (30.1 gal)
Water Capacity114 L (30.1 gal)227 L (60.0 gal)
Accommodation
Berths66
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
Hunter 30
16.94
1990 Pacific Seacraft 34
15.26
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
Hunter 30
41.18
1990 Pacific Seacraft 34
42.87
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
Hunter 30
0.78
1990 Pacific Seacraft 34
0.69
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
Hunter 30
19.54
1990 Pacific Seacraft 34
26.98

Detailed Comparison

The Hunter 30 and 1990 Pacific Seacraft 34 represent different approaches to sailboat design. The Hunter 30 is a 1990s design by Hunter from USA, while the 1990 Pacific Seacraft 34 is a 1990s offering from Pacific Seacraft from USA. The Hunter 30 was penned by Hunter Design Team. The 1990 Pacific Seacraft 34 was designed by William Crealock.

In terms of size, the Hunter 30 measures 9.14m (30.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.05m, compared to the 1990 Pacific Seacraft 34 at 10.36m (34.0ft) with a 3.20m beam. The 1990 Pacific Seacraft 34 is 1.22m longer than the Hunter 30. The 1990 Pacific Seacraft 34 displaces approximately 65% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the Hunter 30 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.94 and 41.0 m² of sail area. The 1990 Pacific Seacraft 34, with an SA/D of 15.26 and 51.5 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The Hunter 30 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the Hunter 30 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 19.5) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.78). The 1990 Pacific Seacraft 34 has a comfort ratio of 27.0 and a capsize screening value of 0.69. The ballast ratios are 41.2% for the Hunter 30 and 42.9% for the 1990 Pacific Seacraft 34, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the Hunter 30 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 114L of water capacity and 57L of fuel. The 1990 Pacific Seacraft 34 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 227L water and 114L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1990 Pacific Seacraft 34 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Hunter 30 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: Hunter 30 · 1990 Pacific Seacraft 34