Hunter 30 vs 2010 Elan 340 — Comparison

Hunter 30Hunter 30
VS
2010 Elan 3402010 Elan 340

Specifications Side by Side

SpecificationHunter 302010 Elan 340
General
ManufacturerHunterElan
Year1991–19962010–2014
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSASlovenia
DesignerHunter Design TeamRob Humphreys
Dimensions
LOA9.14 m (30.0 ft)10.36 m (34.0 ft)
LWL7.92 m (26.0 ft)9.00 m (29.5 ft)
Beam3.05 m (10.0 ft)3.40 m (11.2 ft)
Draft1.52 m (5.0 ft)1.95 m (6.4 ft)
Weight
Displacement3,856 kg (8,501 lbs)5,800 kg (12,787 lbs)
Ballast1,588 kg (3,501 lbs)1,750 kg (3,858 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area41.0 m² (441 ft²)55.0 m² (592 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine18 HP21 HP
Fuel Capacity57 L (15.1 gal)80 L (21.1 gal)
Water Capacity114 L (30.1 gal)160 L (42.3 gal)
Accommodation
Berths66
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
Hunter 30
16.94
2010 Elan 340
17.31
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
Hunter 30
41.18
2010 Elan 340
30.17
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
Hunter 30
0.78
2010 Elan 340
0.76
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
Hunter 30
19.54
2010 Elan 340
19.73

Detailed Comparison

The Hunter 30 and 2010 Elan 340 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The Hunter 30 is a 1990s design by Hunter from USA, while the 2010 Elan 340 is a modern offering from Elan from Slovenia. The Hunter 30 was penned by Hunter Design Team. The 2010 Elan 340 was designed by Rob Humphreys.

In terms of size, the Hunter 30 measures 9.14m (30.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.05m, compared to the 2010 Elan 340 at 10.36m (34.0ft) with a 3.40m beam. The 2010 Elan 340 is 1.22m longer than the Hunter 30. The 2010 Elan 340 displaces approximately 50% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the Hunter 30 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.94 and 41.0 m² of sail area. The 2010 Elan 340, with an SA/D of 17.31 and 55.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The 2010 Elan 340 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the Hunter 30 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 19.5) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.78). The 2010 Elan 340 has a comfort ratio of 19.7 and a capsize screening value of 0.76. The ballast ratios are 41.2% for the Hunter 30 and 30.2% for the 2010 Elan 340, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the Hunter 30 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 114L of water capacity and 57L of fuel. The 2010 Elan 340 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 160L water and 80L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 2010 Elan 340 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 2010 Elan 340 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: Hunter 30 · 2010 Elan 340