1991 Westerly Seahawk vs 2013 Elan 350 — Comparison

1991 Westerly Seahawk1991 Westerly Seahawk
VS
2013 Elan 350

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1991 Westerly Seahawk2013 Elan 350
General
ManufacturerWesterlyElan
Year1991–19972013–2018
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUKSlovenia
DesignerEd DuboisRob Humphreys
Dimensions
LOA10.36 m (34.0 ft)10.67 m (35.0 ft)
LWL8.53 m (28.0 ft)9.30 m (30.5 ft)
Beam3.35 m (11.0 ft)3.46 m (11.4 ft)
Draft1.80 m (5.9 ft)2.00 m (6.6 ft)
Weight
Displacement6,123 kg (13,499 lbs)6,100 kg (13,448 lbs)
Ballast2,495 kg (5,501 lbs)1,850 kg (4,079 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area48.0 m² (517 ft²)58.0 m² (624 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine28 HP21 HP
Fuel Capacity114 L (30.1 gal)80 L (21.1 gal)
Water Capacity220 L (58.1 gal)170 L (44.9 gal)
Accommodation
Berths76
Cabins32

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1991 Westerly Seahawk
14.57
2013 Elan 350
17.65
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1991 Westerly Seahawk
40.75
2013 Elan 350
30.33
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1991 Westerly Seahawk
0.73
2013 Elan 350
0.76
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1991 Westerly Seahawk
22.81
2013 Elan 350
19.02

Detailed Comparison

The 1991 Westerly Seahawk and 2013 Elan 350 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1991 Westerly Seahawk is a 1990s design by Westerly from UK, while the 2013 Elan 350 is a modern offering from Elan from Slovenia. The 1991 Westerly Seahawk was penned by Ed Dubois. The 2013 Elan 350 was designed by Rob Humphreys.

In terms of size, the 1991 Westerly Seahawk measures 10.36m (34.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.35m, compared to the 2013 Elan 350 at 10.67m (35.0ft) with a 3.46m beam. The 2013 Elan 350 is 0.31m longer than the 1991 Westerly Seahawk. The 1991 Westerly Seahawk displaces approximately 0% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1991 Westerly Seahawk has modest sail power for its displacement with an SA/D ratio of 14.57 and 48.0 m² of sail area. The 2013 Elan 350, with an SA/D of 17.65 and 58.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The 2013 Elan 350 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1991 Westerly Seahawk offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 22.8) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.73). The 2013 Elan 350 has a comfort ratio of 19.0 and a capsize screening value of 0.76. The ballast ratios are 40.8% for the 1991 Westerly Seahawk and 30.3% for the 2013 Elan 350, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1991 Westerly Seahawk provides 7 berths in 3 cabins with 220L of water capacity and 114L of fuel. The 2013 Elan 350 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 170L water and 80L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1991 Westerly Seahawk is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 2013 Elan 350 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1991 Westerly Seahawk offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1991 Westerly Seahawk · 2013 Elan 350