Catalina 270 vs 1973 Ranger 33 — Comparison

Catalina 270Catalina 270
VS
1973 Ranger 331973 Ranger 33

Specifications Side by Side

SpecificationCatalina 2701973 Ranger 33
General
ManufacturerCatalinaRanger
Year1992–20021973–1979
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAUSA
DesignerGerry DouglasGary Mull
Dimensions
LOA8.31 m (27.3 ft)10.06 m (33.0 ft)
LWL7.24 m (23.8 ft)8.23 m (27.0 ft)
Beam2.74 m (9.0 ft)3.05 m (10.0 ft)
Draft1.47 m (4.8 ft)1.52 m (5.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement2,313 kg (5,099 lbs)4,763 kg (10,501 lbs)
Ballast907 kg (2,000 lbs)2,041 kg (4,500 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area31.0 m² (334 ft²)43.0 m² (463 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine12 HP15 HP
Fuel Capacity45 L (11.9 gal)57 L (15.1 gal)
Water Capacity68 L (18.0 gal)95 L (25.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths56
Cabins12

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
Catalina 270
18.01
1973 Ranger 33
15.43
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
Catalina 270
39.21
1973 Ranger 33
42.85
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
Catalina 270
0.83
1973 Ranger 33
0.73
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
Catalina 270
16.24
1973 Ranger 33
21.50

Detailed Comparison

The Catalina 270 and 1973 Ranger 33 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The Catalina 270 is a 1990s design by Catalina from USA, while the 1973 Ranger 33 is a 1970s offering from Ranger from USA. The Catalina 270 was penned by Gerry Douglas. The 1973 Ranger 33 was designed by Gary Mull.

In terms of size, the Catalina 270 measures 8.31m (27.3ft) overall with a beam of 2.74m, compared to the 1973 Ranger 33 at 10.06m (33.0ft) with a 3.05m beam. The 1973 Ranger 33 is 1.75m longer than the Catalina 270. The 1973 Ranger 33 displaces approximately 106% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the Catalina 270 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 18.01 and 31.0 m² of sail area. The 1973 Ranger 33, with an SA/D of 15.43 and 43.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The Catalina 270 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the Catalina 270 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 16.2) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.83). The 1973 Ranger 33 has a comfort ratio of 21.5 and a capsize screening value of 0.73. The ballast ratios are 39.2% for the Catalina 270 and 42.9% for the 1973 Ranger 33, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the Catalina 270 provides 5 berths in 1 cabin with 68L of water capacity and 45L of fuel. The 1973 Ranger 33 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 95L water and 57L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1973 Ranger 33 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Catalina 270 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1973 Ranger 33 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: Catalina 270 · 1973 Ranger 33