Catalina 270 vs 1978 Sabre 30 — Comparison

Catalina 270Catalina 270
VS
1978 Sabre 301978 Sabre 30

Specifications Side by Side

SpecificationCatalina 2701978 Sabre 30
General
ManufacturerCatalinaSabre
Year1992–20021978–1985
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAUSA
DesignerGerry DouglasRoger Hewson
Dimensions
LOA8.31 m (27.3 ft)9.14 m (30.0 ft)
LWL7.24 m (23.8 ft)7.47 m (24.5 ft)
Beam2.74 m (9.0 ft)2.97 m (9.7 ft)
Draft1.47 m (4.8 ft)1.37 m (4.5 ft)
Weight
Displacement2,313 kg (5,099 lbs)3,629 kg (8,001 lbs)
Ballast907 kg (2,000 lbs)1,451 kg (3,199 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area31.0 m² (334 ft²)37.0 m² (398 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine12 HP15 HP
Fuel Capacity45 L (11.9 gal)45 L (11.9 gal)
Water Capacity68 L (18.0 gal)76 L (20.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths55
Cabins12

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
Catalina 270
18.01
1978 Sabre 30
15.92
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
Catalina 270
39.21
1978 Sabre 30
39.98
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
Catalina 270
0.83
1978 Sabre 30
0.77
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
Catalina 270
16.24
1978 Sabre 30
20.59

Detailed Comparison

The Catalina 270 and 1978 Sabre 30 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The Catalina 270 is a 1990s design by Catalina from USA, while the 1978 Sabre 30 is a 1970s offering from Sabre from USA. The Catalina 270 was penned by Gerry Douglas. The 1978 Sabre 30 was designed by Roger Hewson.

In terms of size, the Catalina 270 measures 8.31m (27.3ft) overall with a beam of 2.74m, compared to the 1978 Sabre 30 at 9.14m (30.0ft) with a 2.97m beam. The 1978 Sabre 30 is 0.83m longer than the Catalina 270. The 1978 Sabre 30 displaces approximately 57% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the Catalina 270 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 18.01 and 31.0 m² of sail area. The 1978 Sabre 30, with an SA/D of 15.92 and 37.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The Catalina 270 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the Catalina 270 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 16.2) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.83). The 1978 Sabre 30 has a comfort ratio of 20.6 and a capsize screening value of 0.77. The ballast ratios are 39.2% for the Catalina 270 and 40.0% for the 1978 Sabre 30, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the Catalina 270 provides 5 berths in 1 cabin with 68L of water capacity and 45L of fuel. The 1978 Sabre 30 offers 5 berths in 2 cabins with 76L water and 45L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1978 Sabre 30 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Catalina 270 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: Catalina 270 · 1978 Sabre 30