Hunter 27 vs 1990 Pacific Seacraft 34 — Comparison

Hunter 27Hunter 27
VS
1990 Pacific Seacraft 34

Specifications Side by Side

SpecificationHunter 271990 Pacific Seacraft 34
General
ManufacturerHunterPacific Seacraft
Year1992–19981990–2007
TypeSloopCutter
CountryUSAUSA
DesignerHunter Design TeamWilliam Crealock
Dimensions
LOA8.23 m (27.0 ft)10.36 m (34.0 ft)
LWL7.32 m (24.0 ft)8.08 m (26.5 ft)
Beam2.79 m (9.2 ft)3.20 m (10.5 ft)
Draft1.52 m (5.0 ft)1.52 m (5.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement2,495 kg (5,501 lbs)6,350 kg (13,999 lbs)
Ballast907 kg (2,000 lbs)2,722 kg (6,001 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area33.0 m² (355 ft²)51.5 m² (554 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFull
Engine & Tanks
Engine12 HP28 HP
Fuel Capacity45 L (11.9 gal)114 L (30.1 gal)
Water Capacity68 L (18.0 gal)227 L (60.0 gal)
Accommodation
Berths56
Cabins12

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
Hunter 27
18.23
1990 Pacific Seacraft 34
15.26
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
Hunter 27
36.35
1990 Pacific Seacraft 34
42.87
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
Hunter 27
0.82
1990 Pacific Seacraft 34
0.69
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
Hunter 27
16.96
1990 Pacific Seacraft 34
26.98

Detailed Comparison

The Hunter 27 and 1990 Pacific Seacraft 34 represent different approaches to sailboat design. The Hunter 27 is a 1990s design by Hunter from USA, while the 1990 Pacific Seacraft 34 is a 1990s offering from Pacific Seacraft from USA. The Hunter 27 was penned by Hunter Design Team. The 1990 Pacific Seacraft 34 was designed by William Crealock.

In terms of size, the Hunter 27 measures 8.23m (27.0ft) overall with a beam of 2.79m, compared to the 1990 Pacific Seacraft 34 at 10.36m (34.0ft) with a 3.20m beam. The 1990 Pacific Seacraft 34 is 2.13m longer than the Hunter 27. The 1990 Pacific Seacraft 34 displaces approximately 155% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the Hunter 27 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 18.23 and 33.0 m² of sail area. The 1990 Pacific Seacraft 34, with an SA/D of 15.26 and 51.5 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The Hunter 27 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the Hunter 27 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 17.0) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.82). The 1990 Pacific Seacraft 34 has a comfort ratio of 27.0 and a capsize screening value of 0.69. The ballast ratios are 36.4% for the Hunter 27 and 42.9% for the 1990 Pacific Seacraft 34, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the Hunter 27 provides 5 berths in 1 cabin with 68L of water capacity and 45L of fuel. The 1990 Pacific Seacraft 34 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 227L water and 114L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1990 Pacific Seacraft 34 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Hunter 27 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1990 Pacific Seacraft 34 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: Hunter 27 · 1990 Pacific Seacraft 34