1992 J/32 vs Hanse 400 — Comparison
Specifications Side by Side
| Specification | 1992 J/32 | Hanse 400 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Manufacturer | J/Boats | Hanse |
| Year | 1992–1997 | 2002–2006 |
| Type | Sloop | Sloop |
| Country | USA | Germany |
| Designer | Rod Johnstone | judel/vrolijk & co |
| Dimensions | ||
| LOA | 9.91 m (32.5 ft) | 12.10 m (39.7 ft) |
| LWL | 8.38 m (27.5 ft) | 10.60 m (34.8 ft) |
| Beam | 3.13 m (10.3 ft) | 3.80 m (12.5 ft) |
| Draft | 1.83 m (6.0 ft) | 1.95 m (6.4 ft) |
| Weight | ||
| Displacement | 3,856 kg (8,501 lbs) | 7,600 kg (16,755 lbs) |
| Ballast | 1,678 kg (3,699 lbs) | 2,350 kg (5,181 lbs) |
| Sailing | ||
| Sail Area | 48.4 m² (521 ft²) | 68.0 m² (732 ft²) |
| Hull Material | Fiberglass | Fiberglass |
| Keel Type | Fin | Fin |
| Engine & Tanks | ||
| Engine | 18 HP | 29 HP |
| Fuel Capacity | 57 L (15.1 gal) | 150 L (39.6 gal) |
| Water Capacity | 76 L (20.1 gal) | 280 L (74.0 gal) |
| Accommodation | ||
| Berths | 6 | 8 |
| Cabins | 2 | 3 |
Performance Comparison
Detailed Comparison
The 1992 J/32 and Hanse 400 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1992 J/32 is a 1990s design by J/Boats from USA, while the Hanse 400 is a 2000s offering from Hanse from Germany. The 1992 J/32 was penned by Rod Johnstone. The Hanse 400 was designed by judel/vrolijk & co.
In terms of size, the 1992 J/32 measures 9.91m (32.5ft) overall with a beam of 3.13m, compared to the Hanse 400 at 12.10m (39.7ft) with a 3.80m beam. The Hanse 400 is 2.19m longer than the 1992 J/32. The Hanse 400 displaces approximately 97% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.
Looking at performance, the 1992 J/32 has generous sail power for spirited sailing with an SA/D ratio of 20.00 and 48.4 m² of sail area. The Hanse 400, with an SA/D of 17.87 and 68.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The 1992 J/32 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.
For comfort and safety, the 1992 J/32 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 16.6) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.80). The Hanse 400 has a comfort ratio of 16.2 and a capsize screening value of 0.77. The ballast ratios are 43.5% for the 1992 J/32 and 30.9% for the Hanse 400, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.
Below deck, the 1992 J/32 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 76L of water capacity and 57L of fuel. The Hanse 400 offers 8 berths in 3 cabins with 280L water and 150L fuel capacity.
Verdict
For cruising: The 1992 J/32 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.
For racing: The 1992 J/32 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.
For liveaboard: The Hanse 400 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.
Compare Different Boats
Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats