1993 Moody 31 vs Hunter 356 — Comparison

1993 Moody 311993 Moody 31
VS
Hunter 356Hunter 356

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1993 Moody 31Hunter 356
General
ManufacturerMoodyHunter
Year1993–20002000–2005
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUKUSA
DesignerBill DixonGlenn Henderson
Dimensions
LOA9.45 m (31.0 ft)10.82 m (35.5 ft)
LWL7.80 m (25.6 ft)9.30 m (30.5 ft)
Beam3.13 m (10.3 ft)3.53 m (11.6 ft)
Draft1.52 m (5.0 ft)1.80 m (5.9 ft)
Weight
Displacement4,500 kg (9,921 lbs)5,443 kg (12,000 lbs)
Ballast1,800 kg (3,968 lbs)2,177 kg (4,799 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area40.5 m² (436 ft²)53.0 m² (571 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeBilgeFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine18 HP21 HP
Fuel Capacity68 L (18.0 gal)76 L (20.1 gal)
Water Capacity114 L (30.1 gal)151 L (39.9 gal)
Accommodation
Berths66
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1993 Moody 31
15.10
Hunter 356
17.40
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1993 Moody 31
40.00
Hunter 356
40.00
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1993 Moody 31
0.76
Hunter 356
0.80
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1993 Moody 31
21.98
Hunter 356
16.38

Detailed Comparison

The 1993 Moody 31 and Hunter 356 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1993 Moody 31 is a 1990s design by Moody from UK, while the Hunter 356 is a 2000s offering from Hunter from USA. The 1993 Moody 31 was penned by Bill Dixon. The Hunter 356 was designed by Glenn Henderson.

In terms of size, the 1993 Moody 31 measures 9.45m (31.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.13m, compared to the Hunter 356 at 10.82m (35.5ft) with a 3.53m beam. The Hunter 356 is 1.37m longer than the 1993 Moody 31. The Hunter 356 displaces approximately 21% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1993 Moody 31 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 15.10 and 40.5 m² of sail area. The Hunter 356, with an SA/D of 17.40 and 53.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The Hunter 356 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1993 Moody 31 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 22.0) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.76). The Hunter 356 has a comfort ratio of 16.4 and a capsize screening value of 0.80. The ballast ratios are 40.0% for the 1993 Moody 31 and 40.0% for the Hunter 356, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1993 Moody 31 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 114L of water capacity and 68L of fuel. The Hunter 356 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 151L water and 76L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1993 Moody 31 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Hunter 356 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1993 Moody 31 · Hunter 356