1993 Moody 31 vs 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 — Comparison

1993 Moody 311993 Moody 31
VS
2013 Beneteau Figaro 32013 Beneteau Figaro 3

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1993 Moody 312013 Beneteau Figaro 3
General
ManufacturerMoodyBeneteau
Year1993–20002013
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUKFrance
DesignerBill DixonVPLP / Van Peteghem Lauriot-Prévost
Dimensions
LOA9.45 m (31.0 ft)10.10 m (33.1 ft)
LWL7.80 m (25.6 ft)9.45 m (31.0 ft)
Beam3.13 m (10.3 ft)3.40 m (11.2 ft)
Draft1.52 m (5.0 ft)2.10 m (6.9 ft)
Weight
Displacement4,500 kg (9,921 lbs)3,450 kg (7,606 lbs)
Ballast1,800 kg (3,968 lbs)1,500 kg (3,307 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area40.5 m² (436 ft²)65.0 m² (700 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeBilgeFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine18 HP20 HP
Fuel Capacity68 L (18.0 gal)60 L (15.9 gal)
Water Capacity114 L (30.1 gal)40 L (10.6 gal)
Accommodation
Berths62
Cabins21

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1993 Moody 31
15.10
2013 Beneteau Figaro 3
28.93
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1993 Moody 31
40.00
2013 Beneteau Figaro 3
43.48
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1993 Moody 31
0.76
2013 Beneteau Figaro 3
0.90
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1993 Moody 31
21.98
2013 Beneteau Figaro 3
11.16

Detailed Comparison

The 1993 Moody 31 and 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1993 Moody 31 is a 1990s design by Moody from UK, while the 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 is a modern offering from Beneteau from France. The 1993 Moody 31 was penned by Bill Dixon. The 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 was designed by VPLP / Van Peteghem Lauriot-Prévost.

In terms of size, the 1993 Moody 31 measures 9.45m (31.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.13m, compared to the 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 at 10.10m (33.1ft) with a 3.40m beam. The 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 is 0.65m longer than the 1993 Moody 31. The 1993 Moody 31 displaces approximately 30% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1993 Moody 31 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 15.10 and 40.5 m² of sail area. The 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3, with an SA/D of 28.93 and 65.0 m² of canvas, offers generous sail power for spirited sailing. The 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1993 Moody 31 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 22.0) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.76). The 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 has a comfort ratio of 11.2 and a capsize screening value of 0.90. The ballast ratios are 40.0% for the 1993 Moody 31 and 43.5% for the 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1993 Moody 31 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 114L of water capacity and 68L of fuel. The 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 offers 2 berths in 1 cabin with 40L water and 60L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1993 Moody 31 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1993 Moody 31 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1993 Moody 31 · 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3