1994 Najad 343 vs 1982 Freedom 28 — Comparison

1994 Najad 343
VS
1982 Freedom 281982 Freedom 28

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1994 Najad 3431982 Freedom 28
General
ManufacturerNajadFreedom
Year1994–20041982–1988
TypeSloopSloop
CountrySwedenUSA
DesignerJudel/VrolijkGarry Hoyt
Dimensions
LOA10.36 m (34.0 ft)8.53 m (28.0 ft)
LWL8.69 m (28.5 ft)7.01 m (23.0 ft)
Beam3.25 m (10.7 ft)2.84 m (9.3 ft)
Draft1.70 m (5.6 ft)1.14 m (3.7 ft)
Weight
Displacement5,400 kg (11,905 lbs)2,495 kg (5,501 lbs)
Ballast2,200 kg (4,850 lbs)907 kg (2,000 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area47.5 m² (511 ft²)29.0 m² (312 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine28 HP10 HP
Fuel Capacity100 L (26.4 gal)38 L (10.0 gal)
Water Capacity170 L (44.9 gal)57 L (15.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths65
Cabins21

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1994 Najad 343
15.68
1982 Freedom 28
16.02
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1994 Najad 343
40.74
1982 Freedom 28
36.35
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1994 Najad 343
0.74
1982 Freedom 28
0.84
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1994 Najad 343
20.44
1982 Freedom 28
17.13

Detailed Comparison

The 1994 Najad 343 and 1982 Freedom 28 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1994 Najad 343 is a 1990s design by Najad from Sweden, while the 1982 Freedom 28 is a 1980s offering from Freedom from USA. The 1994 Najad 343 was penned by Judel/Vrolijk. The 1982 Freedom 28 was designed by Garry Hoyt.

In terms of size, the 1994 Najad 343 measures 10.36m (34.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.25m, compared to the 1982 Freedom 28 at 8.53m (28.0ft) with a 2.84m beam. The 1994 Najad 343 is 1.83m longer than the 1982 Freedom 28. The 1994 Najad 343 displaces approximately 116% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1994 Najad 343 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 15.68 and 47.5 m² of sail area. The 1982 Freedom 28, with an SA/D of 16.02 and 29.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 1982 Freedom 28 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1994 Najad 343 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 20.4) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.74). The 1982 Freedom 28 has a comfort ratio of 17.1 and a capsize screening value of 0.84. The ballast ratios are 40.7% for the 1994 Najad 343 and 36.4% for the 1982 Freedom 28, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1994 Najad 343 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 170L of water capacity and 100L of fuel. The 1982 Freedom 28 offers 5 berths in 1 cabin with 57L water and 38L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1994 Najad 343 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1982 Freedom 28 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1994 Najad 343 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1994 Najad 343 · 1982 Freedom 28