1995 Beneteau Oceanis 321 vs Hanse 342 — Comparison

1995 Beneteau Oceanis 3211995 Beneteau Oceanis 321
VS
Hanse 342Hanse 342

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1995 Beneteau Oceanis 321Hanse 342
General
ManufacturerBeneteauHanse
Year1995–20012006–2010
TypeSloopSloop
CountryFranceGermany
DesignerGroupe Finotjudel/vrolijk & co
Dimensions
LOA9.68 m (31.8 ft)10.30 m (33.8 ft)
LWL8.45 m (27.7 ft)9.20 m (30.2 ft)
Beam3.27 m (10.7 ft)3.40 m (11.2 ft)
Draft1.60 m (5.2 ft)1.80 m (5.9 ft)
Weight
Displacement4,200 kg (9,259 lbs)5,300 kg (11,684 lbs)
Ballast1,500 kg (3,307 lbs)1,650 kg (3,638 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area44.5 m² (479 ft²)52.0 m² (560 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine18 HP21 HP
Fuel Capacity68 L (18.0 gal)100 L (26.4 gal)
Water Capacity120 L (31.7 gal)180 L (47.6 gal)
Accommodation
Berths66
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1995 Beneteau Oceanis 321
17.37
Hanse 342
17.38
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1995 Beneteau Oceanis 321
35.71
Hanse 342
31.13
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1995 Beneteau Oceanis 321
0.81
Hanse 342
0.78
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1995 Beneteau Oceanis 321
17.12
Hanse 342
17.57

Detailed Comparison

The 1995 Beneteau Oceanis 321 and Hanse 342 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1995 Beneteau Oceanis 321 is a 1990s design by Beneteau from France, while the Hanse 342 is a 2000s offering from Hanse from Germany. The 1995 Beneteau Oceanis 321 was penned by Groupe Finot. The Hanse 342 was designed by judel/vrolijk & co.

In terms of size, the 1995 Beneteau Oceanis 321 measures 9.68m (31.8ft) overall with a beam of 3.27m, compared to the Hanse 342 at 10.30m (33.8ft) with a 3.40m beam. The Hanse 342 is 0.62m longer than the 1995 Beneteau Oceanis 321. The Hanse 342 displaces approximately 26% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1995 Beneteau Oceanis 321 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.37 and 44.5 m² of sail area. The Hanse 342, with an SA/D of 17.38 and 52.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The Hanse 342 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1995 Beneteau Oceanis 321 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 17.1) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.81). The Hanse 342 has a comfort ratio of 17.6 and a capsize screening value of 0.78. The ballast ratios are 35.7% for the 1995 Beneteau Oceanis 321 and 31.1% for the Hanse 342, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1995 Beneteau Oceanis 321 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 120L of water capacity and 68L of fuel. The Hanse 342 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 180L water and 100L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The Hanse 342 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Hanse 342 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1995 Beneteau Oceanis 321 · Hanse 342