1995 Beneteau Oceanis 461 vs 1996 Moody 45 — Comparison

1995 Beneteau Oceanis 461
VS
1996 Moody 451996 Moody 45

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1995 Beneteau Oceanis 4611996 Moody 45
General
ManufacturerBeneteauMoody
Year1995–20001996–2002
TypeSloopSloop
CountryFranceUK
DesignerGroupe FinotBill Dixon
Dimensions
LOA14.02 m (46.0 ft)13.72 m (45.0 ft)
LWL12.19 m (40.0 ft)11.50 m (37.7 ft)
Beam4.37 m (14.3 ft)4.22 m (13.8 ft)
Draft1.90 m (6.2 ft)1.80 m (5.9 ft)
Weight
Displacement11,340 kg (25,000 lbs)12,500 kg (27,558 lbs)
Ballast3,629 kg (8,001 lbs)4,900 kg (10,803 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area88.3 m² (951 ft²)85.0 m² (915 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine55 HP55 HP
Fuel Capacity200 L (52.8 gal)250 L (66.0 gal)
Water Capacity400 L (105.7 gal)450 L (118.9 gal)
Accommodation
Berths88
Cabins43

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1995 Beneteau Oceanis 461
17.77
1996 Moody 45
16.03
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1995 Beneteau Oceanis 461
32.00
1996 Moody 45
39.20
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1995 Beneteau Oceanis 461
0.78
1996 Moody 45
0.73
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1995 Beneteau Oceanis 461
15.05
1996 Moody 45
19.06

Detailed Comparison

The 1995 Beneteau Oceanis 461 and 1996 Moody 45 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1995 Beneteau Oceanis 461 is a 1990s design by Beneteau from France, while the 1996 Moody 45 is a 1990s offering from Moody from UK. The 1995 Beneteau Oceanis 461 was penned by Groupe Finot. The 1996 Moody 45 was designed by Bill Dixon.

In terms of size, the 1995 Beneteau Oceanis 461 measures 14.02m (46.0ft) overall with a beam of 4.37m, compared to the 1996 Moody 45 at 13.72m (45.0ft) with a 4.22m beam. The 1995 Beneteau Oceanis 461 is 0.30m longer than the 1996 Moody 45. The 1996 Moody 45 displaces approximately 10% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1995 Beneteau Oceanis 461 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.77 and 88.3 m² of sail area. The 1996 Moody 45, with an SA/D of 16.03 and 85.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 1995 Beneteau Oceanis 461 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1995 Beneteau Oceanis 461 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 15.1) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.78). The 1996 Moody 45 has a comfort ratio of 19.1 and a capsize screening value of 0.73. The ballast ratios are 32.0% for the 1995 Beneteau Oceanis 461 and 39.2% for the 1996 Moody 45, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1995 Beneteau Oceanis 461 provides 8 berths in 4 cabins with 400L of water capacity and 200L of fuel. The 1996 Moody 45 offers 8 berths in 3 cabins with 450L water and 250L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1996 Moody 45 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1995 Beneteau Oceanis 461 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1995 Beneteau Oceanis 461 · 1996 Moody 45