1995 Beneteau Oceanis 461 vs 2012 Sabre 48 — Comparison

1995 Beneteau Oceanis 461
VS
2012 Sabre 482012 Sabre 48

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1995 Beneteau Oceanis 4612012 Sabre 48
General
ManufacturerBeneteauSabre
Year1995–20002012
TypeSloopSloop
CountryFranceUSA
DesignerGroupe FinotJim Taylor
Dimensions
LOA14.02 m (46.0 ft)14.63 m (48.0 ft)
LWL12.19 m (40.0 ft)12.50 m (41.0 ft)
Beam4.37 m (14.3 ft)4.30 m (14.1 ft)
Draft1.90 m (6.2 ft)2.10 m (6.9 ft)
Weight
Displacement11,340 kg (25,000 lbs)13,608 kg (30,000 lbs)
Ballast3,629 kg (8,001 lbs)5,216 kg (11,499 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area88.3 m² (951 ft²)96.0 m² (1,033 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine55 HP100 HP
Fuel Capacity200 L (52.8 gal)284 L (75.0 gal)
Water Capacity400 L (105.7 gal)454 L (119.9 gal)
Accommodation
Berths87
Cabins43

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1995 Beneteau Oceanis 461
17.77
2012 Sabre 48
17.11
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1995 Beneteau Oceanis 461
32.00
2012 Sabre 48
38.33
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1995 Beneteau Oceanis 461
0.78
2012 Sabre 48
0.72
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1995 Beneteau Oceanis 461
15.05
2012 Sabre 48
17.35

Detailed Comparison

The 1995 Beneteau Oceanis 461 and 2012 Sabre 48 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1995 Beneteau Oceanis 461 is a 1990s design by Beneteau from France, while the 2012 Sabre 48 is a modern offering from Sabre from USA. The 1995 Beneteau Oceanis 461 was penned by Groupe Finot. The 2012 Sabre 48 was designed by Jim Taylor.

In terms of size, the 1995 Beneteau Oceanis 461 measures 14.02m (46.0ft) overall with a beam of 4.37m, compared to the 2012 Sabre 48 at 14.63m (48.0ft) with a 4.30m beam. The 2012 Sabre 48 is 0.61m longer than the 1995 Beneteau Oceanis 461. The 2012 Sabre 48 displaces approximately 20% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1995 Beneteau Oceanis 461 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.77 and 88.3 m² of sail area. The 2012 Sabre 48, with an SA/D of 17.11 and 96.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The 1995 Beneteau Oceanis 461 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1995 Beneteau Oceanis 461 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 15.1) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.78). The 2012 Sabre 48 has a comfort ratio of 17.4 and a capsize screening value of 0.72. The ballast ratios are 32.0% for the 1995 Beneteau Oceanis 461 and 38.3% for the 2012 Sabre 48, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1995 Beneteau Oceanis 461 provides 8 berths in 4 cabins with 400L of water capacity and 200L of fuel. The 2012 Sabre 48 offers 7 berths in 3 cabins with 454L water and 284L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 2012 Sabre 48 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1995 Beneteau Oceanis 461 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1995 Beneteau Oceanis 461 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1995 Beneteau Oceanis 461 · 2012 Sabre 48