Catalina 34 MkII vs 1982 Westerly Konsort — Comparison
1982 Westerly Konsort
Specifications Side by Side
| Specification | Catalina 34 MkII | 1982 Westerly Konsort |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Manufacturer | Catalina | Westerly |
| Year | 1995–2004 | 1982–1990 |
| Type | Sloop | Sloop |
| Country | USA | UK |
| Designer | Gerry Douglas | Ed Dubois |
| Dimensions | ||
| LOA | 10.36 m (34.0 ft) | 9.50 m (31.2 ft) |
| LWL | 9.14 m (30.0 ft) | 7.70 m (25.3 ft) |
| Beam | 3.40 m (11.2 ft) | 3.10 m (10.2 ft) |
| Draft | 1.75 m (5.7 ft) | 1.07 m (3.5 ft) |
| Weight | ||
| Displacement | 5,443 kg (12,000 lbs) | 4,536 kg (10,000 lbs) |
| Ballast | 2,041 kg (4,500 lbs) | 1,633 kg (3,600 lbs) |
| Sailing | ||
| Sail Area | 52.0 m² (560 ft²) | 34.0 m² (366 ft²) |
| Hull Material | Fiberglass | Fiberglass |
| Keel Type | Fin | Bilge |
| Engine & Tanks | ||
| Engine | 21 HP | 15 HP |
| Fuel Capacity | 76 L (20.1 gal) | 68 L (18.0 gal) |
| Water Capacity | 151 L (39.9 gal) | 114 L (30.1 gal) |
| Accommodation | ||
| Berths | 6 | 6 |
| Cabins | 2 | 2 |
Performance Comparison
Detailed Comparison
The Catalina 34 MkII and 1982 Westerly Konsort represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The Catalina 34 MkII is a 1990s design by Catalina from USA, while the 1982 Westerly Konsort is a 1980s offering from Westerly from UK. The Catalina 34 MkII was penned by Gerry Douglas. The 1982 Westerly Konsort was designed by Ed Dubois.
In terms of size, the Catalina 34 MkII measures 10.36m (34.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.40m, compared to the 1982 Westerly Konsort at 9.50m (31.2ft) with a 3.10m beam. The Catalina 34 MkII is 0.86m longer than the 1982 Westerly Konsort. The Catalina 34 MkII displaces approximately 20% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.
Looking at performance, the Catalina 34 MkII has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.08 and 52.0 m² of sail area. The 1982 Westerly Konsort, with an SA/D of 12.61 and 34.0 m² of canvas, offers modest sail power for its displacement. The Catalina 34 MkII has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.
For comfort and safety, the Catalina 34 MkII offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 18.1) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.77). The 1982 Westerly Konsort has a comfort ratio of 22.8 and a capsize screening value of 0.75. The ballast ratios are 37.5% for the Catalina 34 MkII and 36.0% for the 1982 Westerly Konsort, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.
Below deck, the Catalina 34 MkII provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 151L of water capacity and 76L of fuel. The 1982 Westerly Konsort offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 114L water and 68L fuel capacity.
Verdict
For cruising: The 1982 Westerly Konsort is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.
For racing: The Catalina 34 MkII has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.
For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.
Compare Different Boats
Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats
Or view individual specs: Catalina 34 MkII · 1982 Westerly Konsort