Catalina 34 MkII vs 1983 Irwin 32 — Comparison

Catalina 34 MkII
VS
1983 Irwin 32

Specifications Side by Side

SpecificationCatalina 34 MkII1983 Irwin 32
General
ManufacturerCatalinaIrwin
Year1995–20041983–1988
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAUSA
DesignerGerry DouglasTed Irwin
Dimensions
LOA10.36 m (34.0 ft)9.75 m (32.0 ft)
LWL9.14 m (30.0 ft)8.08 m (26.5 ft)
Beam3.40 m (11.2 ft)3.20 m (10.5 ft)
Draft1.75 m (5.7 ft)1.52 m (5.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement5,443 kg (12,000 lbs)4,990 kg (11,001 lbs)
Ballast2,041 kg (4,500 lbs)2,041 kg (4,500 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area52.0 m² (560 ft²)41.0 m² (441 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine21 HP18 HP
Fuel Capacity76 L (20.1 gal)68 L (18.0 gal)
Water Capacity151 L (39.9 gal)114 L (30.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths66
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
Catalina 34 MkII
17.08
1983 Irwin 32
14.27
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
Catalina 34 MkII
37.50
1983 Irwin 32
40.90
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
Catalina 34 MkII
0.77
1983 Irwin 32
0.75
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
Catalina 34 MkII
18.13
1983 Irwin 32
22.12

Detailed Comparison

The Catalina 34 MkII and 1983 Irwin 32 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The Catalina 34 MkII is a 1990s design by Catalina from USA, while the 1983 Irwin 32 is a 1980s offering from Irwin from USA. The Catalina 34 MkII was penned by Gerry Douglas. The 1983 Irwin 32 was designed by Ted Irwin.

In terms of size, the Catalina 34 MkII measures 10.36m (34.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.40m, compared to the 1983 Irwin 32 at 9.75m (32.0ft) with a 3.20m beam. The Catalina 34 MkII is 0.61m longer than the 1983 Irwin 32. The Catalina 34 MkII displaces approximately 9% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the Catalina 34 MkII has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.08 and 52.0 m² of sail area. The 1983 Irwin 32, with an SA/D of 14.27 and 41.0 m² of canvas, offers modest sail power for its displacement. The Catalina 34 MkII has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the Catalina 34 MkII offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 18.1) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.77). The 1983 Irwin 32 has a comfort ratio of 22.1 and a capsize screening value of 0.75. The ballast ratios are 37.5% for the Catalina 34 MkII and 40.9% for the 1983 Irwin 32, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the Catalina 34 MkII provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 151L of water capacity and 76L of fuel. The 1983 Irwin 32 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 114L water and 68L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1983 Irwin 32 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Catalina 34 MkII has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: Catalina 34 MkII · 1983 Irwin 32