1995 J/80 vs 1994 Island Packet 35 — Comparison

1995 J/80
VS
1994 Island Packet 35

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1995 J/801994 Island Packet 35
General
ManufacturerJ/BoatsIsland Packet
Year19951994–2003
TypeSloopCutter
CountryUSAUSA
DesignerRod JohnstoneBob Johnson
Dimensions
LOA8.00 m (26.2 ft)10.67 m (35.0 ft)
LWL7.01 m (23.0 ft)9.14 m (30.0 ft)
Beam2.50 m (8.2 ft)3.56 m (11.7 ft)
Draft1.49 m (4.9 ft)1.32 m (4.3 ft)
Weight
Displacement1,360 kg (2,998 lbs)7,257 kg (15,999 lbs)
Ballast499 kg (1,100 lbs)2,948 kg (6,499 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area32.0 m² (344 ft²)53.5 m² (576 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFull
Engine & Tanks
Engine35 HP
Fuel Capacity151 L (39.9 gal)
Water Capacity265 L (70.0 gal)
Accommodation
Berths26
Cabins2

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1995 J/80
26.50
1994 Island Packet 35
14.50
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1995 J/80
36.69
1994 Island Packet 35
40.62
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1995 J/80
0.90
1994 Island Packet 35
0.74
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1995 J/80
11.55
1994 Island Packet 35
22.30

Detailed Comparison

The 1995 J/80 and 1994 Island Packet 35 represent different approaches to sailboat design. The 1995 J/80 is a 1990s design by J/Boats from USA, while the 1994 Island Packet 35 is a 1990s offering from Island Packet from USA. The 1995 J/80 was penned by Rod Johnstone. The 1994 Island Packet 35 was designed by Bob Johnson.

In terms of size, the 1995 J/80 measures 8.00m (26.2ft) overall with a beam of 2.50m, compared to the 1994 Island Packet 35 at 10.67m (35.0ft) with a 3.56m beam. The 1994 Island Packet 35 is 2.67m longer than the 1995 J/80. The 1994 Island Packet 35 displaces approximately 434% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1995 J/80 has generous sail power for spirited sailing with an SA/D ratio of 26.50 and 32.0 m² of sail area. The 1994 Island Packet 35, with an SA/D of 14.50 and 53.5 m² of canvas, offers modest sail power for its displacement. The 1995 J/80 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1995 J/80 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 11.6) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.90). The 1994 Island Packet 35 has a comfort ratio of 22.3 and a capsize screening value of 0.74. The ballast ratios are 36.7% for the 1995 J/80 and 40.6% for the 1994 Island Packet 35, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1995 J/80 provides 2 berths with unspecified water tankage and unspecified fuel capacity. The 1994 Island Packet 35 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 265L water and 151L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1994 Island Packet 35 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1995 J/80 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1994 Island Packet 35 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1995 J/80 · 1994 Island Packet 35