1995 J/80 vs Hanse 342 — Comparison

1995 J/80
VS
Hanse 342Hanse 342

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1995 J/80Hanse 342
General
ManufacturerJ/BoatsHanse
Year19952006–2010
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAGermany
DesignerRod Johnstonejudel/vrolijk & co
Dimensions
LOA8.00 m (26.2 ft)10.30 m (33.8 ft)
LWL7.01 m (23.0 ft)9.20 m (30.2 ft)
Beam2.50 m (8.2 ft)3.40 m (11.2 ft)
Draft1.49 m (4.9 ft)1.80 m (5.9 ft)
Weight
Displacement1,360 kg (2,998 lbs)5,300 kg (11,684 lbs)
Ballast499 kg (1,100 lbs)1,650 kg (3,638 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area32.0 m² (344 ft²)52.0 m² (560 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine21 HP
Fuel Capacity100 L (26.4 gal)
Water Capacity180 L (47.6 gal)
Accommodation
Berths26
Cabins2

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1995 J/80
26.50
Hanse 342
17.38
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1995 J/80
36.69
Hanse 342
31.13
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1995 J/80
0.90
Hanse 342
0.78
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1995 J/80
11.55
Hanse 342
17.57

Detailed Comparison

The 1995 J/80 and Hanse 342 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1995 J/80 is a 1990s design by J/Boats from USA, while the Hanse 342 is a 2000s offering from Hanse from Germany. The 1995 J/80 was penned by Rod Johnstone. The Hanse 342 was designed by judel/vrolijk & co.

In terms of size, the 1995 J/80 measures 8.00m (26.2ft) overall with a beam of 2.50m, compared to the Hanse 342 at 10.30m (33.8ft) with a 3.40m beam. The Hanse 342 is 2.30m longer than the 1995 J/80. The Hanse 342 displaces approximately 290% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1995 J/80 has generous sail power for spirited sailing with an SA/D ratio of 26.50 and 32.0 m² of sail area. The Hanse 342, with an SA/D of 17.38 and 52.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The 1995 J/80 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1995 J/80 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 11.6) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.90). The Hanse 342 has a comfort ratio of 17.6 and a capsize screening value of 0.78. The ballast ratios are 36.7% for the 1995 J/80 and 31.1% for the Hanse 342, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1995 J/80 provides 2 berths with unspecified water tankage and unspecified fuel capacity. The Hanse 342 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 180L water and 100L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The Hanse 342 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1995 J/80 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The Hanse 342 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1995 J/80 · Hanse 342