1996 Hunter 290 vs Bavaria 34 — Comparison

1996 Hunter 2901996 Hunter 290
VS
Bavaria 34Bavaria 34

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1996 Hunter 290Bavaria 34
General
ManufacturerHunterBavaria
Year1996–20001998–2004
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAGermany
DesignerGlenn HendersonJ&J Design
Dimensions
LOA8.84 m (29.0 ft)10.35 m (34.0 ft)
LWL7.47 m (24.5 ft)9.10 m (29.9 ft)
Beam2.97 m (9.7 ft)3.38 m (11.1 ft)
Draft1.52 m (5.0 ft)1.80 m (5.9 ft)
Weight
Displacement3,493 kg (7,701 lbs)5,200 kg (11,464 lbs)
Ballast1,361 kg (3,000 lbs)1,700 kg (3,748 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area38.9 m² (419 ft²)52.0 m² (560 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine15 HP18 HP
Fuel Capacity57 L (15.1 gal)80 L (21.1 gal)
Water Capacity76 L (20.1 gal)170 L (44.9 gal)
Accommodation
Berths66
Cabins12

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1996 Hunter 290
17.17
Bavaria 34
17.60
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1996 Hunter 290
38.96
Bavaria 34
32.69
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1996 Hunter 290
0.78
Bavaria 34
0.78
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1996 Hunter 290
20.27
Bavaria 34
17.57

Detailed Comparison

The 1996 Hunter 290 and Bavaria 34 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1996 Hunter 290 is a 1990s design by Hunter from USA, while the Bavaria 34 is a 1990s offering from Bavaria from Germany. The 1996 Hunter 290 was penned by Glenn Henderson. The Bavaria 34 was designed by J&J Design.

In terms of size, the 1996 Hunter 290 measures 8.84m (29.0ft) overall with a beam of 2.97m, compared to the Bavaria 34 at 10.35m (34.0ft) with a 3.38m beam. The Bavaria 34 is 1.51m longer than the 1996 Hunter 290. The Bavaria 34 displaces approximately 49% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1996 Hunter 290 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.17 and 38.9 m² of sail area. The Bavaria 34, with an SA/D of 17.60 and 52.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The Bavaria 34 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1996 Hunter 290 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 20.3) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.78). The Bavaria 34 has a comfort ratio of 17.6 and a capsize screening value of 0.78. The ballast ratios are 39.0% for the 1996 Hunter 290 and 32.7% for the Bavaria 34, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1996 Hunter 290 provides 6 berths in 1 cabin with 76L of water capacity and 57L of fuel. The Bavaria 34 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 170L water and 80L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1996 Hunter 290 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Bavaria 34 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1996 Hunter 290 · Bavaria 34