1996 Hunter 290 vs 2005 X-Yachts X-35 — Comparison

1996 Hunter 2901996 Hunter 290
VS
2005 X-Yachts X-352005 X-Yachts X-35

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1996 Hunter 2902005 X-Yachts X-35
General
ManufacturerHunterX-Yachts
Year1996–20002005–2014
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSADenmark
DesignerGlenn HendersonNiels Jeppesen
Dimensions
LOA8.84 m (29.0 ft)10.59 m (34.7 ft)
LWL7.47 m (24.5 ft)9.40 m (30.8 ft)
Beam2.97 m (9.7 ft)3.30 m (10.8 ft)
Draft1.52 m (5.0 ft)2.10 m (6.9 ft)
Weight
Displacement3,493 kg (7,701 lbs)5,500 kg (12,125 lbs)
Ballast1,361 kg (3,000 lbs)2,000 kg (4,409 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area38.9 m² (419 ft²)56.0 m² (603 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine15 HP21 HP
Fuel Capacity57 L (15.1 gal)65 L (17.2 gal)
Water Capacity76 L (20.1 gal)130 L (34.3 gal)
Accommodation
Berths66
Cabins12

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1996 Hunter 290
17.17
2005 X-Yachts X-35
18.26
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1996 Hunter 290
38.96
2005 X-Yachts X-35
36.36
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1996 Hunter 290
0.78
2005 X-Yachts X-35
0.75
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1996 Hunter 290
20.27
2005 X-Yachts X-35
18.10

Detailed Comparison

The 1996 Hunter 290 and 2005 X-Yachts X-35 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1996 Hunter 290 is a 1990s design by Hunter from USA, while the 2005 X-Yachts X-35 is a 2000s offering from X-Yachts from Denmark. The 1996 Hunter 290 was penned by Glenn Henderson. The 2005 X-Yachts X-35 was designed by Niels Jeppesen.

In terms of size, the 1996 Hunter 290 measures 8.84m (29.0ft) overall with a beam of 2.97m, compared to the 2005 X-Yachts X-35 at 10.59m (34.7ft) with a 3.30m beam. The 2005 X-Yachts X-35 is 1.75m longer than the 1996 Hunter 290. The 2005 X-Yachts X-35 displaces approximately 57% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1996 Hunter 290 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.17 and 38.9 m² of sail area. The 2005 X-Yachts X-35, with an SA/D of 18.26 and 56.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The 2005 X-Yachts X-35 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1996 Hunter 290 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 20.3) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.78). The 2005 X-Yachts X-35 has a comfort ratio of 18.1 and a capsize screening value of 0.75. The ballast ratios are 39.0% for the 1996 Hunter 290 and 36.4% for the 2005 X-Yachts X-35, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1996 Hunter 290 provides 6 berths in 1 cabin with 76L of water capacity and 57L of fuel. The 2005 X-Yachts X-35 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 130L water and 65L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1996 Hunter 290 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 2005 X-Yachts X-35 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1996 Hunter 290 · 2005 X-Yachts X-35