1996 Island Packet 40 vs Hunter 306 — Comparison

1996 Island Packet 40
VS
Hunter 306Hunter 306

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1996 Island Packet 40Hunter 306
General
ManufacturerIsland PacketHunter
Year1996–20051999–2004
TypeCutterSloop
CountryUSAUSA
DesignerBob JohnsonGlenn Henderson
Dimensions
LOA12.19 m (40.0 ft)9.25 m (30.3 ft)
LWL10.52 m (34.5 ft)8.08 m (26.5 ft)
Beam3.86 m (12.7 ft)3.10 m (10.2 ft)
Draft1.37 m (4.5 ft)1.65 m (5.4 ft)
Weight
Displacement10,433 kg (23,001 lbs)3,990 kg (8,796 lbs)
Ballast4,082 kg (8,999 lbs)1,588 kg (3,501 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area68.8 m² (741 ft²)43.0 m² (463 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFullFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine55 HP18 HP
Fuel Capacity227 L (60.0 gal)57 L (15.1 gal)
Water Capacity454 L (119.9 gal)114 L (30.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths76
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1996 Island Packet 40
14.64
Hunter 306
17.37
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1996 Island Packet 40
39.13
Hunter 306
39.80
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1996 Island Packet 40
0.71
Hunter 306
0.78
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1996 Island Packet 40
21.83
Hunter 306
19.11

Detailed Comparison

The 1996 Island Packet 40 and Hunter 306 represent different approaches to sailboat design. The 1996 Island Packet 40 is a 1990s design by Island Packet from USA, while the Hunter 306 is a 1990s offering from Hunter from USA. The 1996 Island Packet 40 was penned by Bob Johnson. The Hunter 306 was designed by Glenn Henderson.

In terms of size, the 1996 Island Packet 40 measures 12.19m (40.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.86m, compared to the Hunter 306 at 9.25m (30.3ft) with a 3.10m beam. The 1996 Island Packet 40 is 2.94m longer than the Hunter 306. The 1996 Island Packet 40 displaces approximately 161% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1996 Island Packet 40 has modest sail power for its displacement with an SA/D ratio of 14.64 and 68.8 m² of sail area. The Hunter 306, with an SA/D of 17.37 and 43.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The Hunter 306 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1996 Island Packet 40 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 21.8) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.71). The Hunter 306 has a comfort ratio of 19.1 and a capsize screening value of 0.78. The ballast ratios are 39.1% for the 1996 Island Packet 40 and 39.8% for the Hunter 306, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1996 Island Packet 40 provides 7 berths in 2 cabins with 454L of water capacity and 227L of fuel. The Hunter 306 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 114L water and 57L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1996 Island Packet 40 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Hunter 306 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1996 Island Packet 40 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1996 Island Packet 40 · Hunter 306