1996 Najad 380 vs 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31 — Comparison
Specifications Side by Side
| Specification | 1996 Najad 380 | 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Manufacturer | Najad | Pacific Seacraft |
| Year | 1996–2006 | 1988–2007 |
| Type | Sloop | Sloop |
| Country | Sweden | USA |
| Designer | Judel/Vrolijk | William Crealock |
| Dimensions | ||
| LOA | 11.55 m (37.9 ft) | 9.45 m (31.0 ft) |
| LWL | 9.50 m (31.2 ft) | 7.62 m (25.0 ft) |
| Beam | 3.55 m (11.6 ft) | 3.05 m (10.0 ft) |
| Draft | 1.85 m (6.1 ft) | 1.37 m (4.5 ft) |
| Weight | ||
| Displacement | 7,500 kg (16,535 lbs) | 4,990 kg (11,001 lbs) |
| Ballast | 3,050 kg (6,724 lbs) | 2,177 kg (4,799 lbs) |
| Sailing | ||
| Sail Area | 62.0 m² (667 ft²) | 40.5 m² (436 ft²) |
| Hull Material | Fiberglass | Fiberglass |
| Keel Type | Fin | Full |
| Engine & Tanks | ||
| Engine | 40 HP | 25 HP |
| Fuel Capacity | 150 L (39.6 gal) | 76 L (20.1 gal) |
| Water Capacity | 260 L (68.7 gal) | 151 L (39.9 gal) |
| Accommodation | ||
| Berths | 6 | 5 |
| Cabins | 2 | 2 |
Performance Comparison
Detailed Comparison
The 1996 Najad 380 and 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1996 Najad 380 is a 1990s design by Najad from Sweden, while the 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31 is a 1980s offering from Pacific Seacraft from USA. The 1996 Najad 380 was penned by Judel/Vrolijk. The 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31 was designed by William Crealock.
In terms of size, the 1996 Najad 380 measures 11.55m (37.9ft) overall with a beam of 3.55m, compared to the 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31 at 9.45m (31.0ft) with a 3.05m beam. The 1996 Najad 380 is 2.10m longer than the 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31. The 1996 Najad 380 displaces approximately 50% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.
Looking at performance, the 1996 Najad 380 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.44 and 62.0 m² of sail area. The 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31, with an SA/D of 14.09 and 40.5 m² of canvas, offers modest sail power for its displacement. The 1996 Najad 380 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.
For comfort and safety, the 1996 Najad 380 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 20.8) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.73). The 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31 has a comfort ratio of 26.0 and a capsize screening value of 0.71. The ballast ratios are 40.7% for the 1996 Najad 380 and 43.6% for the 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.
Below deck, the 1996 Najad 380 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 260L of water capacity and 150L of fuel. The 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31 offers 5 berths in 2 cabins with 151L water and 76L fuel capacity.
Verdict
For cruising: The 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.
For racing: The 1996 Najad 380 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.
For liveaboard: The 1996 Najad 380 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.
Compare Different Boats
Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats
Or view individual specs: 1996 Najad 380 · 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31