1997 Dufour 30 Classic vs 1984 Pearson 34 — Comparison

1997 Dufour 30 Classic
VS
1984 Pearson 341984 Pearson 34

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1997 Dufour 30 Classic1984 Pearson 34
General
ManufacturerDufourPearson
Year1997–20031984–1990
TypeSloopSloop
CountryFranceUSA
DesignerUmberto FelciWilliam Shaw
Dimensions
LOA9.15 m (30.0 ft)10.36 m (34.0 ft)
LWL7.80 m (25.6 ft)8.53 m (28.0 ft)
Beam3.10 m (10.2 ft)3.35 m (11.0 ft)
Draft1.60 m (5.2 ft)1.60 m (5.2 ft)
Weight
Displacement3,800 kg (8,378 lbs)5,443 kg (12,000 lbs)
Ballast1,400 kg (3,086 lbs)2,268 kg (5,000 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area40.0 m² (431 ft²)46.0 m² (495 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine15 HP20 HP
Fuel Capacity50 L (13.2 gal)76 L (20.1 gal)
Water Capacity90 L (23.8 gal)152 L (40.2 gal)
Accommodation
Berths56
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1997 Dufour 30 Classic
16.69
1984 Pearson 34
15.11
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1997 Dufour 30 Classic
36.84
1984 Pearson 34
41.67
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1997 Dufour 30 Classic
0.80
1984 Pearson 34
0.76
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1997 Dufour 30 Classic
19.22
1984 Pearson 34
20.28

Detailed Comparison

The 1997 Dufour 30 Classic and 1984 Pearson 34 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1997 Dufour 30 Classic is a 1990s design by Dufour from France, while the 1984 Pearson 34 is a 1980s offering from Pearson from USA. The 1997 Dufour 30 Classic was penned by Umberto Felci. The 1984 Pearson 34 was designed by William Shaw.

In terms of size, the 1997 Dufour 30 Classic measures 9.15m (30.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.10m, compared to the 1984 Pearson 34 at 10.36m (34.0ft) with a 3.35m beam. The 1984 Pearson 34 is 1.21m longer than the 1997 Dufour 30 Classic. The 1984 Pearson 34 displaces approximately 43% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1997 Dufour 30 Classic has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.69 and 40.0 m² of sail area. The 1984 Pearson 34, with an SA/D of 15.11 and 46.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 1997 Dufour 30 Classic has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1997 Dufour 30 Classic offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 19.2) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.80). The 1984 Pearson 34 has a comfort ratio of 20.3 and a capsize screening value of 0.76. The ballast ratios are 36.8% for the 1997 Dufour 30 Classic and 41.7% for the 1984 Pearson 34, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1997 Dufour 30 Classic provides 5 berths in 2 cabins with 90L of water capacity and 50L of fuel. The 1984 Pearson 34 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 152L water and 76L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1984 Pearson 34 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1997 Dufour 30 Classic has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1984 Pearson 34 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1997 Dufour 30 Classic · 1984 Pearson 34