1997 Dufour 30 Classic vs Hunter 260 — Comparison

1997 Dufour 30 Classic
VS
Hunter 260Hunter 260

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1997 Dufour 30 ClassicHunter 260
General
ManufacturerDufourHunter
Year1997–20031998–2004
TypeSloopSloop
CountryFranceUSA
DesignerUmberto FelciGlenn Henderson
Dimensions
LOA9.15 m (30.0 ft)7.85 m (25.8 ft)
LWL7.80 m (25.6 ft)6.86 m (22.5 ft)
Beam3.10 m (10.2 ft)2.74 m (9.0 ft)
Draft1.60 m (5.2 ft)1.37 m (4.5 ft)
Weight
Displacement3,800 kg (8,378 lbs)2,041 kg (4,500 lbs)
Ballast1,400 kg (3,086 lbs)771 kg (1,700 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area40.0 m² (431 ft²)27.5 m² (296 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine15 HP10 HP
Fuel Capacity50 L (13.2 gal)38 L (10.0 gal)
Water Capacity90 L (23.8 gal)57 L (15.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths55
Cabins21

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1997 Dufour 30 Classic
16.69
Hunter 260
17.37
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1997 Dufour 30 Classic
36.84
Hunter 260
37.78
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1997 Dufour 30 Classic
0.80
Hunter 260
0.87
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1997 Dufour 30 Classic
19.22
Hunter 260
15.99

Detailed Comparison

The 1997 Dufour 30 Classic and Hunter 260 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1997 Dufour 30 Classic is a 1990s design by Dufour from France, while the Hunter 260 is a 1990s offering from Hunter from USA. The 1997 Dufour 30 Classic was penned by Umberto Felci. The Hunter 260 was designed by Glenn Henderson.

In terms of size, the 1997 Dufour 30 Classic measures 9.15m (30.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.10m, compared to the Hunter 260 at 7.85m (25.8ft) with a 2.74m beam. The 1997 Dufour 30 Classic is 1.30m longer than the Hunter 260. The 1997 Dufour 30 Classic displaces approximately 86% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1997 Dufour 30 Classic has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.69 and 40.0 m² of sail area. The Hunter 260, with an SA/D of 17.37 and 27.5 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The Hunter 260 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1997 Dufour 30 Classic offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 19.2) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.80). The Hunter 260 has a comfort ratio of 16.0 and a capsize screening value of 0.87. The ballast ratios are 36.8% for the 1997 Dufour 30 Classic and 37.8% for the Hunter 260, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1997 Dufour 30 Classic provides 5 berths in 2 cabins with 90L of water capacity and 50L of fuel. The Hunter 260 offers 5 berths in 1 cabin with 57L water and 38L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1997 Dufour 30 Classic is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Hunter 260 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1997 Dufour 30 Classic · Hunter 260