1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34 vs 1982 Pacific Seacraft 27 — Comparison

1997 Hallberg-Rassy 341997 Hallberg-Rassy 34
VS
1982 Pacific Seacraft 27

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1997 Hallberg-Rassy 341982 Pacific Seacraft 27
General
ManufacturerHallberg-RassyPacific Seacraft
Year1997–20071982–2005
TypeSloopSloop
CountrySwedenUSA
DesignerGerman FrersWilliam Crealock
Dimensions
LOA10.35 m (34.0 ft)8.23 m (27.0 ft)
LWL8.85 m (29.0 ft)6.55 m (21.5 ft)
Beam3.34 m (11.0 ft)2.64 m (8.7 ft)
Draft1.70 m (5.6 ft)1.14 m (3.7 ft)
Weight
Displacement5,800 kg (12,787 lbs)3,175 kg (7,000 lbs)
Ballast2,400 kg (5,291 lbs)1,361 kg (3,000 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area53.0 m² (571 ft²)30.5 m² (328 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFull
Engine & Tanks
Engine28 HP15 HP
Fuel Capacity120 L (31.7 gal)45 L (11.9 gal)
Water Capacity200 L (52.8 gal)76 L (20.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths64
Cabins21

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34
16.68
1982 Pacific Seacraft 27
14.35
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34
41.38
1982 Pacific Seacraft 27
42.87
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34
0.74
1982 Pacific Seacraft 27
0.72
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34
20.67
1982 Pacific Seacraft 27
26.91

Detailed Comparison

The 1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34 and 1982 Pacific Seacraft 27 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34 is a 1990s design by Hallberg-Rassy from Sweden, while the 1982 Pacific Seacraft 27 is a 1980s offering from Pacific Seacraft from USA. The 1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34 was penned by German Frers. The 1982 Pacific Seacraft 27 was designed by William Crealock.

In terms of size, the 1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34 measures 10.35m (34.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.34m, compared to the 1982 Pacific Seacraft 27 at 8.23m (27.0ft) with a 2.64m beam. The 1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34 is 2.12m longer than the 1982 Pacific Seacraft 27. The 1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34 displaces approximately 83% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.68 and 53.0 m² of sail area. The 1982 Pacific Seacraft 27, with an SA/D of 14.35 and 30.5 m² of canvas, offers modest sail power for its displacement. The 1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 20.7) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.74). The 1982 Pacific Seacraft 27 has a comfort ratio of 26.9 and a capsize screening value of 0.72. The ballast ratios are 41.4% for the 1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34 and 42.9% for the 1982 Pacific Seacraft 27, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 200L of water capacity and 120L of fuel. The 1982 Pacific Seacraft 27 offers 4 berths in 1 cabin with 76L water and 45L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1982 Pacific Seacraft 27 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34 · 1982 Pacific Seacraft 27