1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34 vs 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31 — Comparison

1997 Hallberg-Rassy 341997 Hallberg-Rassy 34
VS
1988 Pacific Seacraft 31

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1997 Hallberg-Rassy 341988 Pacific Seacraft 31
General
ManufacturerHallberg-RassyPacific Seacraft
Year1997–20071988–2007
TypeSloopSloop
CountrySwedenUSA
DesignerGerman FrersWilliam Crealock
Dimensions
LOA10.35 m (34.0 ft)9.45 m (31.0 ft)
LWL8.85 m (29.0 ft)7.62 m (25.0 ft)
Beam3.34 m (11.0 ft)3.05 m (10.0 ft)
Draft1.70 m (5.6 ft)1.37 m (4.5 ft)
Weight
Displacement5,800 kg (12,787 lbs)4,990 kg (11,001 lbs)
Ballast2,400 kg (5,291 lbs)2,177 kg (4,799 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area53.0 m² (571 ft²)40.5 m² (436 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFull
Engine & Tanks
Engine28 HP25 HP
Fuel Capacity120 L (31.7 gal)76 L (20.1 gal)
Water Capacity200 L (52.8 gal)151 L (39.9 gal)
Accommodation
Berths65
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34
16.68
1988 Pacific Seacraft 31
14.09
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34
41.38
1988 Pacific Seacraft 31
43.63
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34
0.74
1988 Pacific Seacraft 31
0.71
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34
20.67
1988 Pacific Seacraft 31
26.02

Detailed Comparison

The 1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34 and 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34 is a 1990s design by Hallberg-Rassy from Sweden, while the 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31 is a 1980s offering from Pacific Seacraft from USA. The 1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34 was penned by German Frers. The 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31 was designed by William Crealock.

In terms of size, the 1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34 measures 10.35m (34.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.34m, compared to the 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31 at 9.45m (31.0ft) with a 3.05m beam. The 1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34 is 0.90m longer than the 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31. The 1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34 displaces approximately 16% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.68 and 53.0 m² of sail area. The 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31, with an SA/D of 14.09 and 40.5 m² of canvas, offers modest sail power for its displacement. The 1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 20.7) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.74). The 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31 has a comfort ratio of 26.0 and a capsize screening value of 0.71. The ballast ratios are 41.4% for the 1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34 and 43.6% for the 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 200L of water capacity and 120L of fuel. The 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31 offers 5 berths in 2 cabins with 151L water and 76L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34 · 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31