1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34 vs 1990 Feeling 32 — Comparison

1997 Hallberg-Rassy 341997 Hallberg-Rassy 34
VS
1990 Feeling 321990 Feeling 32

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1997 Hallberg-Rassy 341990 Feeling 32
General
ManufacturerHallberg-RassyFeeling
Year1997–20071990–1998
TypeSloopSloop
CountrySwedenFrance
DesignerGerman FrersPhilippe Harlé
Dimensions
LOA10.35 m (34.0 ft)9.85 m (32.3 ft)
LWL8.85 m (29.0 ft)8.20 m (26.9 ft)
Beam3.34 m (11.0 ft)3.15 m (10.3 ft)
Draft1.70 m (5.6 ft)1.50 m (4.9 ft)
Weight
Displacement5,800 kg (12,787 lbs)4,700 kg (10,362 lbs)
Ballast2,400 kg (5,291 lbs)1,700 kg (3,748 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area53.0 m² (571 ft²)40.0 m² (431 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine28 HP18 HP
Fuel Capacity120 L (31.7 gal)60 L (15.9 gal)
Water Capacity200 L (52.8 gal)120 L (31.7 gal)
Accommodation
Berths65
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34
16.68
1990 Feeling 32
14.49
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34
41.38
1990 Feeling 32
36.17
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34
0.74
1990 Feeling 32
0.75
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34
20.67
1990 Feeling 32
20.72

Detailed Comparison

The 1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34 and 1990 Feeling 32 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34 is a 1990s design by Hallberg-Rassy from Sweden, while the 1990 Feeling 32 is a 1990s offering from Feeling from France. The 1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34 was penned by German Frers. The 1990 Feeling 32 was designed by Philippe Harlé.

In terms of size, the 1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34 measures 10.35m (34.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.34m, compared to the 1990 Feeling 32 at 9.85m (32.3ft) with a 3.15m beam. The 1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34 is 0.50m longer than the 1990 Feeling 32. The 1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34 displaces approximately 23% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.68 and 53.0 m² of sail area. The 1990 Feeling 32, with an SA/D of 14.49 and 40.0 m² of canvas, offers modest sail power for its displacement. The 1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 20.7) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.74). The 1990 Feeling 32 has a comfort ratio of 20.7 and a capsize screening value of 0.75. The ballast ratios are 41.4% for the 1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34 and 36.2% for the 1990 Feeling 32, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 200L of water capacity and 120L of fuel. The 1990 Feeling 32 offers 5 berths in 2 cabins with 120L water and 60L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1990 Feeling 32 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34 · 1990 Feeling 32