1998 Beneteau Oceanis 36 CC vs Hunter 36 — Comparison

1998 Beneteau Oceanis 36 CC1998 Beneteau Oceanis 36 CC
VS
Hunter 36Hunter 36

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1998 Beneteau Oceanis 36 CCHunter 36
General
ManufacturerBeneteauHunter
Year1998–20031996–2001
TypeSloopSloop
CountryFranceUSA
DesignerGroupe FinotGlenn Henderson
Dimensions
LOA10.97 m (36.0 ft)10.82 m (35.5 ft)
LWL9.45 m (31.0 ft)9.45 m (31.0 ft)
Beam3.65 m (12.0 ft)3.56 m (11.7 ft)
Draft1.68 m (5.5 ft)1.83 m (6.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement7,100 kg (15,653 lbs)5,897 kg (13,001 lbs)
Ballast2,500 kg (5,512 lbs)2,313 kg (5,099 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area59.0 m² (635 ft²)56.0 m² (603 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine28 HP27 HP
Fuel Capacity100 L (26.4 gal)95 L (25.1 gal)
Water Capacity200 L (52.8 gal)170 L (44.9 gal)
Accommodation
Berths76
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1998 Beneteau Oceanis 36 CC
16.23
Hunter 36
17.43
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1998 Beneteau Oceanis 36 CC
35.21
Hunter 36
39.22
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1998 Beneteau Oceanis 36 CC
0.76
Hunter 36
0.79
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1998 Beneteau Oceanis 36 CC
19.82
Hunter 36
17.17

Detailed Comparison

The 1998 Beneteau Oceanis 36 CC and Hunter 36 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1998 Beneteau Oceanis 36 CC is a 1990s design by Beneteau from France, while the Hunter 36 is a 1990s offering from Hunter from USA. The 1998 Beneteau Oceanis 36 CC was penned by Groupe Finot. The Hunter 36 was designed by Glenn Henderson.

In terms of size, the 1998 Beneteau Oceanis 36 CC measures 10.97m (36.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.65m, compared to the Hunter 36 at 10.82m (35.5ft) with a 3.56m beam. The 1998 Beneteau Oceanis 36 CC is 0.15m longer than the Hunter 36. The 1998 Beneteau Oceanis 36 CC displaces approximately 20% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1998 Beneteau Oceanis 36 CC has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.23 and 59.0 m² of sail area. The Hunter 36, with an SA/D of 17.43 and 56.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The Hunter 36 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1998 Beneteau Oceanis 36 CC offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 19.8) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.76). The Hunter 36 has a comfort ratio of 17.2 and a capsize screening value of 0.79. The ballast ratios are 35.2% for the 1998 Beneteau Oceanis 36 CC and 39.2% for the Hunter 36, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1998 Beneteau Oceanis 36 CC provides 7 berths in 2 cabins with 200L of water capacity and 100L of fuel. The Hunter 36 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 170L water and 95L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1998 Beneteau Oceanis 36 CC is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Hunter 36 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1998 Beneteau Oceanis 36 CC offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1998 Beneteau Oceanis 36 CC · Hunter 36