1998 Catalina 42 vs Catalina 42 MkII — Comparison

1998 Catalina 421998 Catalina 42
VS
Catalina 42 MkII

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1998 Catalina 42Catalina 42 MkII
General
ManufacturerCatalinaCatalina
Year1998–20042003–2009
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAUSA
DesignerGerry DouglasGerry Douglas
Dimensions
LOA12.80 m (42.0 ft)12.80 m (42.0 ft)
LWL10.82 m (35.5 ft)11.10 m (36.4 ft)
Beam3.96 m (13.0 ft)3.96 m (13.0 ft)
Draft1.83 m (6.0 ft)1.85 m (6.1 ft)
Weight
Displacement9,525 kg (20,999 lbs)9,525 kg (20,999 lbs)
Ballast3,856 kg (8,501 lbs)3,629 kg (8,001 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area72.5 m² (780 ft²)76.0 m² (818 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine40 HP55 HP
Fuel Capacity151 L (39.9 gal)152 L (40.2 gal)
Water Capacity303 L (80.0 gal)303 L (80.0 gal)
Accommodation
Berths87
Cabins32

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1998 Catalina 42
16.39
Catalina 42 MkII
17.18
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1998 Catalina 42
40.48
Catalina 42 MkII
38.10
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1998 Catalina 42
0.75
Catalina 42 MkII
0.75
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1998 Catalina 42
17.96
Catalina 42 MkII
17.36

Detailed Comparison

The 1998 Catalina 42 and Catalina 42 MkII represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1998 Catalina 42 is a 1990s design by Catalina from USA, while the Catalina 42 MkII is a 2000s offering from Catalina from USA. The 1998 Catalina 42 was penned by Gerry Douglas. The Catalina 42 MkII was designed by Gerry Douglas.

In terms of size, the 1998 Catalina 42 measures 12.80m (42.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.96m, compared to the Catalina 42 MkII at 12.80m (42.0ft) with a 3.96m beam.

Looking at performance, the 1998 Catalina 42 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.39 and 72.5 m² of sail area. The Catalina 42 MkII, with an SA/D of 17.18 and 76.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The Catalina 42 MkII has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1998 Catalina 42 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 18.0) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.75). The Catalina 42 MkII has a comfort ratio of 17.4 and a capsize screening value of 0.75. The ballast ratios are 40.5% for the 1998 Catalina 42 and 38.1% for the Catalina 42 MkII, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1998 Catalina 42 provides 8 berths in 3 cabins with 303L of water capacity and 151L of fuel. The Catalina 42 MkII offers 7 berths in 2 cabins with 303L water and 152L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1998 Catalina 42 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Catalina 42 MkII has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1998 Catalina 42 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1998 Catalina 42 · Catalina 42 MkII