1998 Catalina 42 vs Bavaria 46 — Comparison

1998 Catalina 421998 Catalina 42
VS
Bavaria 46Bavaria 46

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1998 Catalina 42Bavaria 46
General
ManufacturerCatalinaBavaria
Year1998–20042004–2009
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAGermany
DesignerGerry DouglasJ&J Design
Dimensions
LOA12.80 m (42.0 ft)14.27 m (46.8 ft)
LWL10.82 m (35.5 ft)12.50 m (41.0 ft)
Beam3.96 m (13.0 ft)4.35 m (14.3 ft)
Draft1.83 m (6.0 ft)2.15 m (7.1 ft)
Weight
Displacement9,525 kg (20,999 lbs)11,200 kg (24,692 lbs)
Ballast3,856 kg (8,501 lbs)3,500 kg (7,716 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area72.5 m² (780 ft²)95.0 m² (1,023 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine40 HP55 HP
Fuel Capacity151 L (39.9 gal)250 L (66.0 gal)
Water Capacity303 L (80.0 gal)450 L (118.9 gal)
Accommodation
Berths810
Cabins34

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1998 Catalina 42
16.39
Bavaria 46
19.28
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1998 Catalina 42
40.48
Bavaria 46
31.25
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1998 Catalina 42
0.75
Bavaria 46
0.78
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1998 Catalina 42
17.96
Bavaria 46
14.30

Detailed Comparison

The 1998 Catalina 42 and Bavaria 46 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1998 Catalina 42 is a 1990s design by Catalina from USA, while the Bavaria 46 is a 2000s offering from Bavaria from Germany. The 1998 Catalina 42 was penned by Gerry Douglas. The Bavaria 46 was designed by J&J Design.

In terms of size, the 1998 Catalina 42 measures 12.80m (42.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.96m, compared to the Bavaria 46 at 14.27m (46.8ft) with a 4.35m beam. The Bavaria 46 is 1.47m longer than the 1998 Catalina 42. The Bavaria 46 displaces approximately 18% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1998 Catalina 42 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.39 and 72.5 m² of sail area. The Bavaria 46, with an SA/D of 19.28 and 95.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The Bavaria 46 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1998 Catalina 42 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 18.0) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.75). The Bavaria 46 has a comfort ratio of 14.3 and a capsize screening value of 0.78. The ballast ratios are 40.5% for the 1998 Catalina 42 and 31.3% for the Bavaria 46, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1998 Catalina 42 provides 8 berths in 3 cabins with 303L of water capacity and 151L of fuel. The Bavaria 46 offers 10 berths in 4 cabins with 450L water and 250L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1998 Catalina 42 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Bavaria 46 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The Bavaria 46 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1998 Catalina 42 · Bavaria 46