1998 Dehler 29 vs 1983 Pearson 31 — Comparison
1983 Pearson 31
Specifications Side by Side
| Specification | 1998 Dehler 29 | 1983 Pearson 31 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Manufacturer | Dehler | Pearson |
| Year | 1998–2006 | 1983–1990 |
| Type | Sloop | Sloop |
| Country | Germany | USA |
| Designer | Judel/Vrolijk | William Shaw |
| Dimensions | ||
| LOA | 8.82 m (28.9 ft) | 9.45 m (31.0 ft) |
| LWL | 7.60 m (24.9 ft) | 7.77 m (25.5 ft) |
| Beam | 2.95 m (9.7 ft) | 3.10 m (10.2 ft) |
| Draft | 1.55 m (5.1 ft) | 1.52 m (5.0 ft) |
| Weight | ||
| Displacement | 3,200 kg (7,055 lbs) | 4,309 kg (9,500 lbs) |
| Ballast | 1,200 kg (2,646 lbs) | 1,814 kg (3,999 lbs) |
| Sailing | ||
| Sail Area | 35.0 m² (377 ft²) | 40.0 m² (431 ft²) |
| Hull Material | Fiberglass | Fiberglass |
| Keel Type | Fin | Fin |
| Engine & Tanks | ||
| Engine | 14 HP | 18 HP |
| Fuel Capacity | 40 L (10.6 gal) | 68 L (18.0 gal) |
| Water Capacity | 80 L (21.1 gal) | 114 L (30.1 gal) |
| Accommodation | ||
| Berths | 5 | 6 |
| Cabins | 2 | 2 |
Performance Comparison
Detailed Comparison
The 1998 Dehler 29 and 1983 Pearson 31 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1998 Dehler 29 is a 1990s design by Dehler from Germany, while the 1983 Pearson 31 is a 1980s offering from Pearson from USA. The 1998 Dehler 29 was penned by Judel/Vrolijk. The 1983 Pearson 31 was designed by William Shaw.
In terms of size, the 1998 Dehler 29 measures 8.82m (28.9ft) overall with a beam of 2.95m, compared to the 1983 Pearson 31 at 9.45m (31.0ft) with a 3.10m beam. The 1983 Pearson 31 is 0.63m longer than the 1998 Dehler 29. The 1983 Pearson 31 displaces approximately 35% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.
Looking at performance, the 1998 Dehler 29 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.38 and 35.0 m² of sail area. The 1983 Pearson 31, with an SA/D of 15.35 and 40.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 1998 Dehler 29 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.
For comfort and safety, the 1998 Dehler 29 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 18.3) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.80). The 1983 Pearson 31 has a comfort ratio of 21.4 and a capsize screening value of 0.76. The ballast ratios are 37.5% for the 1998 Dehler 29 and 42.1% for the 1983 Pearson 31, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.
Below deck, the 1998 Dehler 29 provides 5 berths in 2 cabins with 80L of water capacity and 40L of fuel. The 1983 Pearson 31 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 114L water and 68L fuel capacity.
Verdict
For cruising: The 1983 Pearson 31 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.
For racing: The 1998 Dehler 29 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.
For liveaboard: The 1983 Pearson 31 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.
Compare Different Boats
Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats
Or view individual specs: 1998 Dehler 29 · 1983 Pearson 31