1998 Dehler 29 vs 1990 Pacific Seacraft 34 — Comparison

1998 Dehler 29
VS
1990 Pacific Seacraft 34

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1998 Dehler 291990 Pacific Seacraft 34
General
ManufacturerDehlerPacific Seacraft
Year1998–20061990–2007
TypeSloopCutter
CountryGermanyUSA
DesignerJudel/VrolijkWilliam Crealock
Dimensions
LOA8.82 m (28.9 ft)10.36 m (34.0 ft)
LWL7.60 m (24.9 ft)8.08 m (26.5 ft)
Beam2.95 m (9.7 ft)3.20 m (10.5 ft)
Draft1.55 m (5.1 ft)1.52 m (5.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement3,200 kg (7,055 lbs)6,350 kg (13,999 lbs)
Ballast1,200 kg (2,646 lbs)2,722 kg (6,001 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area35.0 m² (377 ft²)51.5 m² (554 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFull
Engine & Tanks
Engine14 HP28 HP
Fuel Capacity40 L (10.6 gal)114 L (30.1 gal)
Water Capacity80 L (21.1 gal)227 L (60.0 gal)
Accommodation
Berths56
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1998 Dehler 29
16.38
1990 Pacific Seacraft 34
15.26
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1998 Dehler 29
37.50
1990 Pacific Seacraft 34
42.87
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1998 Dehler 29
0.80
1990 Pacific Seacraft 34
0.69
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1998 Dehler 29
18.34
1990 Pacific Seacraft 34
26.98

Detailed Comparison

The 1998 Dehler 29 and 1990 Pacific Seacraft 34 represent different approaches to sailboat design. The 1998 Dehler 29 is a 1990s design by Dehler from Germany, while the 1990 Pacific Seacraft 34 is a 1990s offering from Pacific Seacraft from USA. The 1998 Dehler 29 was penned by Judel/Vrolijk. The 1990 Pacific Seacraft 34 was designed by William Crealock.

In terms of size, the 1998 Dehler 29 measures 8.82m (28.9ft) overall with a beam of 2.95m, compared to the 1990 Pacific Seacraft 34 at 10.36m (34.0ft) with a 3.20m beam. The 1990 Pacific Seacraft 34 is 1.54m longer than the 1998 Dehler 29. The 1990 Pacific Seacraft 34 displaces approximately 98% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1998 Dehler 29 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.38 and 35.0 m² of sail area. The 1990 Pacific Seacraft 34, with an SA/D of 15.26 and 51.5 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 1998 Dehler 29 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1998 Dehler 29 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 18.3) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.80). The 1990 Pacific Seacraft 34 has a comfort ratio of 27.0 and a capsize screening value of 0.69. The ballast ratios are 37.5% for the 1998 Dehler 29 and 42.9% for the 1990 Pacific Seacraft 34, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1998 Dehler 29 provides 5 berths in 2 cabins with 80L of water capacity and 40L of fuel. The 1990 Pacific Seacraft 34 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 227L water and 114L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1990 Pacific Seacraft 34 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1998 Dehler 29 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1990 Pacific Seacraft 34 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1998 Dehler 29 · 1990 Pacific Seacraft 34