Hunter 260 vs 1990 Island Packet 29 — Comparison

Hunter 260Hunter 260
VS
1990 Island Packet 291990 Island Packet 29

Specifications Side by Side

SpecificationHunter 2601990 Island Packet 29
General
ManufacturerHunterIsland Packet
Year1998–20041990–1998
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAUSA
DesignerGlenn HendersonBob Johnson
Dimensions
LOA7.85 m (25.8 ft)8.84 m (29.0 ft)
LWL6.86 m (22.5 ft)7.47 m (24.5 ft)
Beam2.74 m (9.0 ft)3.05 m (10.0 ft)
Draft1.37 m (4.5 ft)1.12 m (3.7 ft)
Weight
Displacement2,041 kg (4,500 lbs)3,856 kg (8,501 lbs)
Ballast771 kg (1,700 lbs)1,588 kg (3,501 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area27.5 m² (296 ft²)33.5 m² (361 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFull
Engine & Tanks
Engine10 HP18 HP
Fuel Capacity38 L (10.0 gal)76 L (20.1 gal)
Water Capacity57 L (15.1 gal)132 L (34.9 gal)
Accommodation
Berths55
Cabins11

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
Hunter 260
17.37
1990 Island Packet 29
13.84
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
Hunter 260
37.78
1990 Island Packet 29
41.18
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
Hunter 260
0.87
1990 Island Packet 29
0.78
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
Hunter 260
15.99
1990 Island Packet 29
21.60

Detailed Comparison

The Hunter 260 and 1990 Island Packet 29 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The Hunter 260 is a 1990s design by Hunter from USA, while the 1990 Island Packet 29 is a 1990s offering from Island Packet from USA. The Hunter 260 was penned by Glenn Henderson. The 1990 Island Packet 29 was designed by Bob Johnson.

In terms of size, the Hunter 260 measures 7.85m (25.8ft) overall with a beam of 2.74m, compared to the 1990 Island Packet 29 at 8.84m (29.0ft) with a 3.05m beam. The 1990 Island Packet 29 is 0.99m longer than the Hunter 260. The 1990 Island Packet 29 displaces approximately 89% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the Hunter 260 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.37 and 27.5 m² of sail area. The 1990 Island Packet 29, with an SA/D of 13.84 and 33.5 m² of canvas, offers modest sail power for its displacement. The Hunter 260 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the Hunter 260 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 16.0) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.87). The 1990 Island Packet 29 has a comfort ratio of 21.6 and a capsize screening value of 0.78. The ballast ratios are 37.8% for the Hunter 260 and 41.2% for the 1990 Island Packet 29, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the Hunter 260 provides 5 berths in 1 cabin with 57L of water capacity and 38L of fuel. The 1990 Island Packet 29 offers 5 berths in 1 cabin with 132L water and 76L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1990 Island Packet 29 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Hunter 260 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: Hunter 260 · 1990 Island Packet 29