Hunter 280 vs 1972 Ericson 32 — Comparison

Hunter 280Hunter 280
VS
1972 Ericson 321972 Ericson 32

Specifications Side by Side

SpecificationHunter 2801972 Ericson 32
General
ManufacturerHunterEricson
Year1998–20031972–1978
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAUSA
DesignerGlenn HendersonBruce King
Dimensions
LOA8.53 m (28.0 ft)9.75 m (32.0 ft)
LWL7.47 m (24.5 ft)7.62 m (25.0 ft)
Beam2.82 m (9.3 ft)3.05 m (10.0 ft)
Draft1.52 m (5.0 ft)1.52 m (5.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement2,585 kg (5,699 lbs)4,309 kg (9,500 lbs)
Ballast998 kg (2,200 lbs)1,814 kg (3,999 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area34.0 m² (366 ft²)39.0 m² (420 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine15 HP15 HP
Fuel Capacity45 L (11.9 gal)57 L (15.1 gal)
Water Capacity76 L (20.1 gal)95 L (25.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths56
Cabins12

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
Hunter 280
18.35
1972 Ericson 32
14.97
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
Hunter 280
38.61
1972 Ericson 32
42.10
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
Hunter 280
0.82
1972 Ericson 32
0.75
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
Hunter 280
16.46
1972 Ericson 32
21.98

Detailed Comparison

The Hunter 280 and 1972 Ericson 32 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The Hunter 280 is a 1990s design by Hunter from USA, while the 1972 Ericson 32 is a 1970s offering from Ericson from USA. The Hunter 280 was penned by Glenn Henderson. The 1972 Ericson 32 was designed by Bruce King.

In terms of size, the Hunter 280 measures 8.53m (28.0ft) overall with a beam of 2.82m, compared to the 1972 Ericson 32 at 9.75m (32.0ft) with a 3.05m beam. The 1972 Ericson 32 is 1.22m longer than the Hunter 280. The 1972 Ericson 32 displaces approximately 67% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the Hunter 280 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 18.35 and 34.0 m² of sail area. The 1972 Ericson 32, with an SA/D of 14.97 and 39.0 m² of canvas, offers modest sail power for its displacement. The Hunter 280 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the Hunter 280 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 16.5) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.82). The 1972 Ericson 32 has a comfort ratio of 22.0 and a capsize screening value of 0.75. The ballast ratios are 38.6% for the Hunter 280 and 42.1% for the 1972 Ericson 32, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the Hunter 280 provides 5 berths in 1 cabin with 76L of water capacity and 45L of fuel. The 1972 Ericson 32 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 95L water and 57L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1972 Ericson 32 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Hunter 280 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1972 Ericson 32 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: Hunter 280 · 1972 Ericson 32