Hunter 280 vs 1979 Westerly Fulmar — Comparison

Hunter 280Hunter 280
VS
1979 Westerly Fulmar1979 Westerly Fulmar

Specifications Side by Side

SpecificationHunter 2801979 Westerly Fulmar
General
ManufacturerHunterWesterly
Year1998–20031979–1986
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAUK
DesignerGlenn HendersonEd Dubois
Dimensions
LOA8.53 m (28.0 ft)9.75 m (32.0 ft)
LWL7.47 m (24.5 ft)8.00 m (26.2 ft)
Beam2.82 m (9.3 ft)3.20 m (10.5 ft)
Draft1.52 m (5.0 ft)1.07 m (3.5 ft)
Weight
Displacement2,585 kg (5,699 lbs)4,990 kg (11,001 lbs)
Ballast998 kg (2,200 lbs)1,814 kg (3,999 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area34.0 m² (366 ft²)36.0 m² (388 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinBilge
Engine & Tanks
Engine15 HP18 HP
Fuel Capacity45 L (11.9 gal)68 L (18.0 gal)
Water Capacity76 L (20.1 gal)136 L (35.9 gal)
Accommodation
Berths56
Cabins12

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
Hunter 280
18.35
1979 Westerly Fulmar
12.53
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
Hunter 280
38.61
1979 Westerly Fulmar
36.35
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
Hunter 280
0.82
1979 Westerly Fulmar
0.75
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
Hunter 280
16.46
1979 Westerly Fulmar
22.41

Detailed Comparison

The Hunter 280 and 1979 Westerly Fulmar represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The Hunter 280 is a 1990s design by Hunter from USA, while the 1979 Westerly Fulmar is a 1970s offering from Westerly from UK. The Hunter 280 was penned by Glenn Henderson. The 1979 Westerly Fulmar was designed by Ed Dubois.

In terms of size, the Hunter 280 measures 8.53m (28.0ft) overall with a beam of 2.82m, compared to the 1979 Westerly Fulmar at 9.75m (32.0ft) with a 3.20m beam. The 1979 Westerly Fulmar is 1.22m longer than the Hunter 280. The 1979 Westerly Fulmar displaces approximately 93% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the Hunter 280 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 18.35 and 34.0 m² of sail area. The 1979 Westerly Fulmar, with an SA/D of 12.53 and 36.0 m² of canvas, offers modest sail power for its displacement. The Hunter 280 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the Hunter 280 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 16.5) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.82). The 1979 Westerly Fulmar has a comfort ratio of 22.4 and a capsize screening value of 0.75. The ballast ratios are 38.6% for the Hunter 280 and 36.4% for the 1979 Westerly Fulmar, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the Hunter 280 provides 5 berths in 1 cabin with 76L of water capacity and 45L of fuel. The 1979 Westerly Fulmar offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 136L water and 68L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1979 Westerly Fulmar is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Hunter 280 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1979 Westerly Fulmar offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: Hunter 280 · 1979 Westerly Fulmar