Hunter 280 vs 1990 Feeling 32 — Comparison
Hunter 280
1990 Feeling 32
Specifications Side by Side
| Specification | Hunter 280 | 1990 Feeling 32 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Manufacturer | Hunter | Feeling |
| Year | 1998–2003 | 1990–1998 |
| Type | Sloop | Sloop |
| Country | USA | France |
| Designer | Glenn Henderson | Philippe Harlé |
| Dimensions | ||
| LOA | 8.53 m (28.0 ft) | 9.85 m (32.3 ft) |
| LWL | 7.47 m (24.5 ft) | 8.20 m (26.9 ft) |
| Beam | 2.82 m (9.3 ft) | 3.15 m (10.3 ft) |
| Draft | 1.52 m (5.0 ft) | 1.50 m (4.9 ft) |
| Weight | ||
| Displacement | 2,585 kg (5,699 lbs) | 4,700 kg (10,362 lbs) |
| Ballast | 998 kg (2,200 lbs) | 1,700 kg (3,748 lbs) |
| Sailing | ||
| Sail Area | 34.0 m² (366 ft²) | 40.0 m² (431 ft²) |
| Hull Material | Fiberglass | Fiberglass |
| Keel Type | Fin | Fin |
| Engine & Tanks | ||
| Engine | 15 HP | 18 HP |
| Fuel Capacity | 45 L (11.9 gal) | 60 L (15.9 gal) |
| Water Capacity | 76 L (20.1 gal) | 120 L (31.7 gal) |
| Accommodation | ||
| Berths | 5 | 5 |
| Cabins | 1 | 2 |
Performance Comparison
Detailed Comparison
The Hunter 280 and 1990 Feeling 32 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The Hunter 280 is a 1990s design by Hunter from USA, while the 1990 Feeling 32 is a 1990s offering from Feeling from France. The Hunter 280 was penned by Glenn Henderson. The 1990 Feeling 32 was designed by Philippe Harlé.
In terms of size, the Hunter 280 measures 8.53m (28.0ft) overall with a beam of 2.82m, compared to the 1990 Feeling 32 at 9.85m (32.3ft) with a 3.15m beam. The 1990 Feeling 32 is 1.32m longer than the Hunter 280. The 1990 Feeling 32 displaces approximately 82% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.
Looking at performance, the Hunter 280 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 18.35 and 34.0 m² of sail area. The 1990 Feeling 32, with an SA/D of 14.49 and 40.0 m² of canvas, offers modest sail power for its displacement. The Hunter 280 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.
For comfort and safety, the Hunter 280 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 16.5) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.82). The 1990 Feeling 32 has a comfort ratio of 20.7 and a capsize screening value of 0.75. The ballast ratios are 38.6% for the Hunter 280 and 36.2% for the 1990 Feeling 32, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.
Below deck, the Hunter 280 provides 5 berths in 1 cabin with 76L of water capacity and 45L of fuel. The 1990 Feeling 32 offers 5 berths in 2 cabins with 120L water and 60L fuel capacity.
Verdict
For cruising: The 1990 Feeling 32 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.
For racing: The Hunter 280 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.
For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.
Compare Different Boats
Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats
Or view individual specs: Hunter 280 · 1990 Feeling 32