Hunter 280 vs 1998 Island Packet 37 — Comparison

Hunter 280Hunter 280
VS
1998 Island Packet 37

Specifications Side by Side

SpecificationHunter 2801998 Island Packet 37
General
ManufacturerHunterIsland Packet
Year1998–20031998–2005
TypeSloopCutter
CountryUSAUSA
DesignerGlenn HendersonBob Johnson
Dimensions
LOA8.53 m (28.0 ft)11.28 m (37.0 ft)
LWL7.47 m (24.5 ft)9.45 m (31.0 ft)
Beam2.82 m (9.3 ft)3.66 m (12.0 ft)
Draft1.52 m (5.0 ft)1.37 m (4.5 ft)
Weight
Displacement2,585 kg (5,699 lbs)8,165 kg (18,001 lbs)
Ballast998 kg (2,200 lbs)3,266 kg (7,200 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area34.0 m² (366 ft²)58.0 m² (624 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFull
Engine & Tanks
Engine15 HP40 HP
Fuel Capacity45 L (11.9 gal)170 L (44.9 gal)
Water Capacity76 L (20.1 gal)303 L (80.0 gal)
Accommodation
Berths56
Cabins12

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
Hunter 280
18.35
1998 Island Packet 37
14.53
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
Hunter 280
38.61
1998 Island Packet 37
40.00
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
Hunter 280
0.82
1998 Island Packet 37
0.73
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
Hunter 280
16.46
1998 Island Packet 37
22.28

Detailed Comparison

The Hunter 280 and 1998 Island Packet 37 represent different approaches to sailboat design. The Hunter 280 is a 1990s design by Hunter from USA, while the 1998 Island Packet 37 is a 1990s offering from Island Packet from USA. The Hunter 280 was penned by Glenn Henderson. The 1998 Island Packet 37 was designed by Bob Johnson.

In terms of size, the Hunter 280 measures 8.53m (28.0ft) overall with a beam of 2.82m, compared to the 1998 Island Packet 37 at 11.28m (37.0ft) with a 3.66m beam. The 1998 Island Packet 37 is 2.75m longer than the Hunter 280. The 1998 Island Packet 37 displaces approximately 216% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the Hunter 280 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 18.35 and 34.0 m² of sail area. The 1998 Island Packet 37, with an SA/D of 14.53 and 58.0 m² of canvas, offers modest sail power for its displacement. The Hunter 280 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the Hunter 280 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 16.5) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.82). The 1998 Island Packet 37 has a comfort ratio of 22.3 and a capsize screening value of 0.73. The ballast ratios are 38.6% for the Hunter 280 and 40.0% for the 1998 Island Packet 37, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the Hunter 280 provides 5 berths in 1 cabin with 76L of water capacity and 45L of fuel. The 1998 Island Packet 37 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 303L water and 170L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1998 Island Packet 37 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Hunter 280 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1998 Island Packet 37 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: Hunter 280 · 1998 Island Packet 37