Hunter 280 vs 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 — Comparison

Hunter 280Hunter 280
VS
2013 Beneteau Figaro 32013 Beneteau Figaro 3

Specifications Side by Side

SpecificationHunter 2802013 Beneteau Figaro 3
General
ManufacturerHunterBeneteau
Year1998–20032013
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAFrance
DesignerGlenn HendersonVPLP / Van Peteghem Lauriot-Prévost
Dimensions
LOA8.53 m (28.0 ft)10.10 m (33.1 ft)
LWL7.47 m (24.5 ft)9.45 m (31.0 ft)
Beam2.82 m (9.3 ft)3.40 m (11.2 ft)
Draft1.52 m (5.0 ft)2.10 m (6.9 ft)
Weight
Displacement2,585 kg (5,699 lbs)3,450 kg (7,606 lbs)
Ballast998 kg (2,200 lbs)1,500 kg (3,307 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area34.0 m² (366 ft²)65.0 m² (700 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine15 HP20 HP
Fuel Capacity45 L (11.9 gal)60 L (15.9 gal)
Water Capacity76 L (20.1 gal)40 L (10.6 gal)
Accommodation
Berths52
Cabins11

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
Hunter 280
18.35
2013 Beneteau Figaro 3
28.93
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
Hunter 280
38.61
2013 Beneteau Figaro 3
43.48
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
Hunter 280
0.82
2013 Beneteau Figaro 3
0.90
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
Hunter 280
16.46
2013 Beneteau Figaro 3
11.16

Detailed Comparison

The Hunter 280 and 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The Hunter 280 is a 1990s design by Hunter from USA, while the 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 is a modern offering from Beneteau from France. The Hunter 280 was penned by Glenn Henderson. The 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 was designed by VPLP / Van Peteghem Lauriot-Prévost.

In terms of size, the Hunter 280 measures 8.53m (28.0ft) overall with a beam of 2.82m, compared to the 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 at 10.10m (33.1ft) with a 3.40m beam. The 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 is 1.57m longer than the Hunter 280. The 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 displaces approximately 33% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the Hunter 280 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 18.35 and 34.0 m² of sail area. The 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3, with an SA/D of 28.93 and 65.0 m² of canvas, offers generous sail power for spirited sailing. The 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the Hunter 280 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 16.5) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.82). The 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 has a comfort ratio of 11.2 and a capsize screening value of 0.90. The ballast ratios are 38.6% for the Hunter 280 and 43.5% for the 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the Hunter 280 provides 5 berths in 1 cabin with 76L of water capacity and 45L of fuel. The 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 offers 2 berths in 1 cabin with 40L water and 60L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The Hunter 280 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The Hunter 280 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: Hunter 280 · 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3