1998 X-Yachts 332 vs Hunter 27 — Comparison

1998 X-Yachts 332
VS
Hunter 27Hunter 27

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1998 X-Yachts 332Hunter 27
General
ManufacturerX-YachtsHunter
Year1998–20031992–1998
TypeSloopSloop
CountryDenmarkUSA
DesignerNiels JeppesenHunter Design Team
Dimensions
LOA10.06 m (33.0 ft)8.23 m (27.0 ft)
LWL8.69 m (28.5 ft)7.32 m (24.0 ft)
Beam3.13 m (10.3 ft)2.79 m (9.2 ft)
Draft1.80 m (5.9 ft)1.52 m (5.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement4,700 kg (10,362 lbs)2,495 kg (5,501 lbs)
Ballast1,900 kg (4,189 lbs)907 kg (2,000 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area50.5 m² (544 ft²)33.0 m² (355 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine18 HP12 HP
Fuel Capacity60 L (15.9 gal)45 L (11.9 gal)
Water Capacity120 L (31.7 gal)68 L (18.0 gal)
Accommodation
Berths65
Cabins21

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1998 X-Yachts 332
18.29
Hunter 27
18.23
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1998 X-Yachts 332
40.43
Hunter 27
36.35
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1998 X-Yachts 332
0.75
Hunter 27
0.82
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1998 X-Yachts 332
19.07
Hunter 27
16.96

Detailed Comparison

The 1998 X-Yachts 332 and Hunter 27 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1998 X-Yachts 332 is a 1990s design by X-Yachts from Denmark, while the Hunter 27 is a 1990s offering from Hunter from USA. The 1998 X-Yachts 332 was penned by Niels Jeppesen. The Hunter 27 was designed by Hunter Design Team.

In terms of size, the 1998 X-Yachts 332 measures 10.06m (33.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.13m, compared to the Hunter 27 at 8.23m (27.0ft) with a 2.79m beam. The 1998 X-Yachts 332 is 1.83m longer than the Hunter 27. The 1998 X-Yachts 332 displaces approximately 88% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1998 X-Yachts 332 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 18.29 and 50.5 m² of sail area. The Hunter 27, with an SA/D of 18.23 and 33.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The 1998 X-Yachts 332 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1998 X-Yachts 332 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 19.1) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.75). The Hunter 27 has a comfort ratio of 17.0 and a capsize screening value of 0.82. The ballast ratios are 40.4% for the 1998 X-Yachts 332 and 36.4% for the Hunter 27, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1998 X-Yachts 332 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 120L of water capacity and 60L of fuel. The Hunter 27 offers 5 berths in 1 cabin with 68L water and 45L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1998 X-Yachts 332 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1998 X-Yachts 332 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1998 X-Yachts 332 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1998 X-Yachts 332 · Hunter 27